David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30 (1):26–49 (2000)
To help consider why some groups solve problems successfully but others do not, this article introduces a framework for analyzing sequences of group members' actions. The dimensions of evaluation of the previous action , knowledge content , and invitational form organize twenty-seven individual actions, each with specific functions and conditions of use. Evaluations, repetitions and invitational forms link actions together to create coherent social interactions, and thereby serve as possible quantitative measures of collaboration quality. Specific individual action also helps constitute specific social interactions. Six types of social interactions that occur during group problem-solving are organized by problem knowledge distribution and degree of cooperation . This framework's mutually exclusive categories and multi-function individual actions allow statistical analyses of many group interactions both in their entirety and infine detail
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Husain Sarkar (2007). Group Rationality in Scientific Research. Cambridge University Press.
René Victor Valqui Vidal (2007). Creativity for Problem Solvers. AI and Society 23 (3):409-432.
Herbert Simon (1995). Machine Discovery. Foundations of Science 1 (2):171-200.
Stan A. Kuczaj, John D. Gory & Mark J. Xitco (1998). Using Programs to Solve Problems: Imitation Versus Insight. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):695-696.
Anna Weller, Gaëlle Villejoubert & Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau (2011). Interactive Insight Problem Solving. Thinking and Reasoning 17 (4):424 - 439.
Lisa M. Osbeck & Nancy J. Nersessian (2011). Affective Problem Solving: Emotion in Research Practice. Mind and Society 10 (1):57-78.
Jan Narveson (2002). Collective Responsibility. Journal of Ethics 6 (2):179-198.
Dorothy M. Fragaszy (2000). Extending the Model: Pavlovian Social Learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):255-256.
Mareike B. Wieth & Rose T. Zacks (2011). Time of Day Effects on Problem Solving: When the Non-Optimal is Optimal. Thinking and Reasoning 17 (4):387 - 401.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #290,652 of 1,696,464 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #246,076 of 1,696,464 )
How can I increase my downloads?