Horwich's justification of induction
Philosophical Studies 48 (1):107 - 110 (1985)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGerhard Schurz (2009). Meta-Induction and Social Epistemology: Computer Simulations of Prediction Games. Episteme 6 (2):200-220.
James Cargile (1998). The Problem of Induction. Philosophy 73 (2):247-275.
Gerhard Schurz (2008). The Meta-Inductivist's Winning Strategy in the Prediction Game: A New Approach to Hume's Problem. Philosophy of Science 75 (3):278-305.
Newton C. A. Costa & Steven French (1991). On Russell's Principle of Induction. Synthese 86 (2):285-295.
Richard Swinburne (ed.) (1974). The Justification of Induction. New York]Oxford University Press.
James Woodward (1985). Critical Review: Horwich on the Ravens, Projectability and Induction. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 47 (3):409 - 428.
Newton C. A. da Costa & Steven French (1991). On Russell's Principle of Induction. Synthese 86 (2):285 - 295.
Branden Fitelson (1996). Wayne, Horwich, and Evidential Diversity. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):652-660.
F. John Clendinnen (1966). Induction and Objectivity. Philosophy of Science 33 (3):215-229.
Frederick L. Will (1974). Induction and Justification. Ithaca [N.Y.]Cornell University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads23 ( #53,853 of 549,090 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,333 of 549,090 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
