David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Politics 73 (4):1239-50 (2011)
Although there is no more iconic, stalwart, and eloquent defender of liberty and representative democracy than J.S. Mill, he sometimes endorses non-democratic forms of governance. This article explains the reasons behind this seeming aberration and shows that Mill actually has complex and nuanced views of the transition from non-democratic to democratic government, including the comprehensive and parallel material, cultural, institutional, and character reforms that must occur, and the mechanism by which they will be enacted. Namely, an enlightened despot must cultivate democratic virtues such as obedience, industriousness, spirit of nationality, and resistance to tyranny in the population and simultaneously prepare the way for his own demise and secure his own legitimacy by transitioning to the rule of law. This challenges recent scholarship that paints Mill’s non-democratic views as crudely and uncritically imperialist, because it fails to recognize and engage seriously with his sophisticated (if ultimately problematic) theory of individual and institutional development under enlightened colonialism.
|Keywords||Mill democratic transitions virtue enlightened despotism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robert S. Taylor (2006). Democratic Transitions and the Progress of Absolutism in Kant's Political Thought. Journal of Politics 68 (3):556-570.
David Ellerman (2009). The Workplace: A Forgotten Topic in Democratic Theory? Kettering Review:51-57.
Peter Berkowitz (2003). The Demagoguery of Democratic Theory. Critical Review 15 (1-2):123-145.
Kate Macdonald & Terry Macdonald (2010). Democracy in a Pluralist Global Order: Corporate Power and Stakeholder Representation. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (1):19-43.
Jeff Noonan (2005). Modernization, Rights, and Democratic Society: The Limits of Habermas's Democratic Theory. [REVIEW] Res Publica 11 (2):101-123.
Maughn Gregory (2000). Care as a Goal of Democratic Education. Journal of Moral Education 29 (4):445-461.
Mihaela Mihai (2010). Transitional Justice and the Quest for Democracy: A Contribution to a Political Theory of Democratic Transformations. Ratio Juris 23 (2):183-204.
Clifton Sanders (2009). Democracy as Music, Music as Democracy. Radical Philosophy Review 12 (1/2):219-239.
David Plotke (2006). Democratic Polities and Anti-Democratic Politics. Theoria 53 (111):6-44.
Christopher S. King (2012). Problems in the Theory of Democratic Authority. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):431 - 448.
Alexander S. Madatov (2008). Problems of the Structure and Hierarchy of Democratic Values. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:445-449.
Added to index2011-04-08
Total downloads100 ( #45,956 of 1,902,713 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #110,919 of 1,902,713 )
How can I increase my downloads?