The tribunal of philosophy and its norms: History and philosophy in Georges Canguilhem's historical epistemology
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (2):297-327 (2003)
| Abstract | In this article I assess Georges Canguilhem's historical epistemology with both theoretical and historical questions in mind. From a theoretical point of view, I am concerned with the relation between history and philosophy, and in particular with the philosophical assumptions and external norms that are involved in history writing. Moreover, I am concerned with the role that history can play in the understanding and evaluation of philosophical concepts. From a historical point of view, I regard historical epistemology, as developed by Gaston Bachelard and Georges Canguilhem, as a conception and practice which came out of the project, elaborated in France from the 1920s to the 1940s, of combining history of science and philosophy. I analyse in particular Canguilhem's epistemology in his theory and practice of history of science. What he called 'normative history' is the focus of my analysis. I evaluate the question of the nature and provenience of the norm employed in normative history, and I compare it with the norm as discussed by Canguilhem in Le normal et le pathologique. While I am critical of Canguilhem's treatment of history, I conclude that his philosophical suggestion to analyse the formation of scientific concepts 'from below' represents a useful model for history and philosophy of science, and that it can be very profitably extended to philosophical concepts. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPeter Trnka (2003). Subjectivity and Values in Medicine: The Case of Canguilhem. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (4):427 – 446.
Uljana Feest & Thomas Sturm (2011). What (Good) is Historical Epistemology? Editors' Introduction. Erkenntnis 75 (3):285-302.
Gary Gutting (1989). Michel Foucault's Archaeology of Scientific Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (2005). Gaston Bachelard and the Notion of "Phenomenotechnique". Perspectives on Science 13 (3):313-328.
Barry Stroud (2011). Epistemology, the History of Epistemology, Historical Epistemology. Erkenntnis 75 (3):495-503.
G. Canguilhem (1985). Bibliographie Des Travaux de Georges Canguilhem. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 90 (1):99 - 105.
Sebastian Rand (2011). Organism, Normativity, Plasticity: Canguilhem, Kant, Malabou. Continental Philosophy Review 44 (4):341-357.
Mary Tiles (2011). Is Historical Epistemology Part of the 'Modernist Settlement'? Erkenntnis 75 (3):525-543.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads17 ( #72,058 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,489 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
