|Abstract||From the Series Editor's Introduction: For much of the twentieth century, French intellectual life was dominated by theoreticians and historians of mentalite. Traditionally, the study of the mind and of its limits and capabilities was the domain of philosophy, however in the first decades of the twentieth century practitioners of the emergent human and social sciences were increasingly competing with philosophers in this field: ethnologists, sociologists, psychologists and historians of science were all claiming to study 'how people think'. Scholars, including Gaston Bachelard, Georges Canguilhem, Leon Brunschvicg, Lucien Levy-Bruhl, Lucien Febvre, Abel Rey, Alexandre Koyre and Helene Metzger were all investigating the mind historically and participating in shared research projects. Yet, as they have since been appropriated by the different disciplines, literature on their findings has so far failed to recognise the connections between their research and their importance in intellectual history.In this exemplary book, Cristina Chimisso reconstructs the world of these intellectuals and the key debates in the philosophy of mind, particularly between those who studied specific mentalities by employing prevalently historical and philological methods, and those who thought it possible to write a history of the mind, outlining the evolution of ways of thinking that had produced the modern mentality. Dr Chimisso situates the key French scholars in their historical context and shows how their ideas and agendas were indissolubly linked with their social and institutional positions, such as their political and religious allegiances, their status in academia, and their familial situation.The author employs a vast range of original research, using philosophical and scientific texts as well as archive documents, correspondence and seminar minutes from the period covered, to recreate the milieu in which these relatively neglected scholars made advances in the history of philosophy and science, and produced ideas that would greatly influence later intellectuals such as Foucault, Derrida and Bourdieu. This book will appeal to historians of science and philosophy, particularly Continental philosophy, and those with interest in the history of ideas and the historiography of the disciplines of the social sciences.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Knud Haakonssen (ed.) (2006). The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Teresa Castelão-Lawless (2010). Writing the History of the Mind: Philosophy and Science in France, 1900-1960s. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (1):178-181.
C. Chimisso (2003). The Tribunal of Philosophy and its Norms: History and Philosophy in Georges Canguilhem's Historical Epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (2):297-327.
Cristina Chimisso (2008). From Phenomenology to Phenomenotechnique: The Role of Early Twentieth-Century Physics in Gaston Bachelard's Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (3):384-392.
Peter Burke (ed.) (2002). History and Historians in the Twentieth Century. Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
Cristina Chimisso, Constructing Narratives and Reading Texts: Approaches to History and Power Struggles Between Philosophy and Emergent Disciplines in Inter-War France.
C. Chimisso (2001). Helene Metzger: The History of Science Between the Study of Mentalities and Total History. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):203-241.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-07-25
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?