|Abstract||This thesis seeks to make a contribution to the history of modern continental philosophy by establishing a structural link between the thoughts of Friedrich Nietzsche and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. I argue that this link lies in the question of truth: both thinkers criticise the traditional concept of truth as objectivity. However, they both find in the existence of this very concept a problem that its rejection alone does not solve. What is it in our natural axistence that gave rise to the notion of truth? It is this questioning which I call the "question of truth". I locate three ways in which the question of truth informs Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty's thoughts. Firstly, both thinkers propose a genealogy of the concept of "truth," one in which they suggest that our natural existence is structured in a pre-objective way: existing means making implicit truthclaims. Further, they each explain the appearance of our belief in truth in terms of a radicalisation of this implicit attribution of truth (Chapters I and IV). Secondly, both thinkers seek to recover the pre-objective ground from which truth as an erroneous concept arose. They propose strikingly similar methods to do so (Chapters II and V). This ground, once uncovered, must be examined. This investigation leads both Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty to ontological considerations. They both ask how we must conceive of a Being whose structure allows for the existence of the belief in truth, or as I argue, error. As a conclusion, I suggest that both thinkers' investigations of the question of truth lead them to conceive of Being in a similar way, as the process of self-falsification by which indeterminate Being presents itself as determinate (Chapters III and VI)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Galen A. Johnson (1993). Generosity and Forgetting in the History of Being: Merleau-Ponty and Nietzsche. In Hugh J. Silverman (ed.), Questioning Foundations: Truth/Subjectivity/Culture.
John T. Sanders (1994). Merleau-Ponty on Meaning, Materiality, and Structure. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 25 (1):96-100.
Funaki Toru (2009). The Notion of the Words That Speak the Truth in Merleau-Ponty and Shinran. In Jin Y. Park & Gereon Kopf (eds.), Merleau-Ponty and Buddhism. Lexington Books.
Robert Greenleaf Brice & Patrick L. Bourgeois (2012). Naturalism Reconsidered: Wittgenstein and Merleau-Ponty. Philosophy Today 56 (1):78-83.
Andrea Hurst (2007). Supposing Truth is a Woman – What Then? South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):44-55.
Fred Evans (1998). "Solar Love": Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty and the Fortunes of Perception. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 31 (2):171-193.
Donald Davidson (1994). What is Quine's View of Truth? Inquiry 37 (4):437 – 440.
A. Ridley (2010). Perishing of the Truth: Nietzsche's Aesthetic Prophylactics. British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (4):427-437.
Ron Morstyn (2010). How the Philosophy of Merleau- Ponty Can Help Us Understand the Gulf Between Clinical Experience and the Doctrine of Evidence-Based Psychotherapy. Australasian Psychiatry 18 ( 3):221–225.
Jack Reynolds & Jon Roffe (2006). Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty: Immanence, Univocity and Phenomenology. Journal of the British Society of Phenomenology 37 (3):228-51.
Stephen Priest (1998). Merleau-Ponty. Routledge.
Jan A. Aertsen (1992). Truth as Transcendental in Thomas Aquinas. Topoi 11 (2):159-171.
Panu Raatikainen (2000). The Concept of Truth in a Finite Universe. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (6):617-633.
Ann V. Murphy (2010). “All Things Considered:” Sensibility and Ethics in the Later Merleau-Ponty and Derrida. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 42 (4):435-447.
M. C. Dillon (1971). Gestalt Theory and Merleau-Ponty's Concept of Intentionality. Man and World 4 (4):436-459.
Added to index2012-01-10
Total downloads12 ( #101,180 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,863 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?