Graduate studies at Western
Erkenntnis 67 (1):1 - 16 (2007)
|Abstract||Recently Stephen Barker has raised stimulating objections to the thesis that, roughly speaking, if two events stand in a relation of counterfactual dependence, they stand in a causal relation. As Ned Hall says, however, this thesis constitutes the strongest part of the counterfactual analysis of causation. Therefore, if successful, Barker’s objections will undermine the cornerstone of the counterfactual analysis of causation, and hence give us compelling reasons to reject the counterfactual analysis of causation. I will argue, however, that they do not withstand scrutiny.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Brad Weslake (forthcoming). A Partial Theory of Actual Causation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
L. A. Paul (1998). Keeping Track of the Time: Emending the Counterfactual Analysis of Causation. Analysis 58 (3):191–198.
Peter Menzies, Counterfactual Theories of Causation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Richard Otte (1987). Indeterminism, Counterfactuals, and Causation. Philosophy of Science 54 (1):45-62.
Jig-Chuen Lee (1986). Causal Condition, Causal Asymmetry, and the Counterfactual Analysis of Causation. Synthese 67 (2):213 - 223.
Mathias Frisch (2010). Causes, Counterfactuals, and Non-Locality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):655-672.
Alex Broadbent (2007). Reversing the Counterfactual Analysis of Causation. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (2):169 – 189.
S. Barker (2003). A Dilemma for the Counterfactual Analysis of Causation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (1):62 – 77.
David Fair (1979). Causation and the Flow of Energy. Erkenntnis 14 (3):219 - 250.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #19,276 of 739,350 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,545 of 739,350 )
How can I increase my downloads?