Chomsky on the Mind–Body Problem
| Abstract | Some people say that the founding document of twentieth-century cognitive science was Chomsky’s (1959) review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. (Certainly it converted me.2) By any measure, Chomsky was a leading figure in the victory of cognitivism over behaviorism in psychology. In philosophy too, Chomsky led the attack against Quine’s behaviorism regarding language and language learning.3 Moreover, Chomsky’s (1957, 1965) expressly computational view of language processing was a major inspiration for Functionalism in the philosophy of mind, as founded by Hilary Putnam and Jerry Fodor.4 Thus, when Chomsky turned his attention specifically and explicitly to the mind–body problem, one might naturally have expected him to grant his endorsement to Functionalism, whether or not he were to say anything further.5 But if one had expected that, one would have been wrong. For in his writings on the mind–body problem, Chomsky has vigorously challenged several of the claims and presuppositions characteristically made by Functionalists. I shall survey some of those challenges and, as a zealous Functionalist myself, try to rebut them seriatim. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesWilliam G. Lycan (2003). Chomsky on the Mind - Body Problem. In Chomsky and His Critics. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Noam Chomsky (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Tony Stone & Martin Davies (2002). Chomsky Among the Philosophers. Mind and Language 17 (3):276-289.
Francis Y. Lin (1999). Chomsky on the 'Ordinary Language' View of Language. Synthese 120 (2):151-191.
Hilary Putnam (1980). Comments on Chomsky's and Fodor's Replies. In Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.), Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Harvard University Press.
Fred D'Agostino (2001). Double Review: Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals by Neil Smith and Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics by James McGilvray. Mind and Language 16 (3):335–344.
Noam A. Chomsky & Jerry A. Fodor (1980). The Inductivist Fallacy. In Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.), Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Harvard University Press.
Louise M. Antony (ed.) (2003). Chomsky and His Critics. Malden MA: Blackwell Publishing.
David Lightfood (2005). Plato's Problem, Ug, and the Language Organ. In James McGilvray (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. Cambridge University Press.
Noam A. Chomsky (1980). Discussion of Putnam's Comments. In Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.), Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Harvard University Press.
Harold Morick (1972). Challenges to Empiricism. Belmont, Calif.,Wadsworth Pub. Co..
Dunja Jutronić (2005). Chomsky Amongst the Philosophers. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):423-431.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-12-22Total downloads65 ( #13,961 of 549,041 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,186 of 549,041 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
