David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):139-165 (1998)
This essay seeks to step beyond the argument between ethical formalism and ethical naturalism concerning the nature of moral reason and to step outside the universalism versus relativism debate in cross-cultural studies. Its thesis is that both formalism and naturalism advance versions of moral reason that are functionaries of intellectual discussions that make sense of behavior and that such discussion should not be confused with the ostensible object of ethical inquiry-that is, with moral actions and the motivations that drive them. Daoist thought provides a comparative base from which the nature and limitation of such ethical theories can be examined. The essay concludes by suggesting that the objectification and scrutiny of our own forms of knowledge can be a specific purpose of comparative ethics, which has the virtue of making explicit the value commitments behind our intellectual theories
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Robin W. Lovin (1998). Moral Reason, Risk, and Comparative Inquiry: A Response to Francisca Cho. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):167-174.
Robin W. Lovin & Frank E. Reynolds (1992). Ethical Naturalism and Indigenous Cultures: Introduction. Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (2):267 - 278.
Ronald M. Green (1998). Heuristic Power as the Test of Theory: A Response to Francisca Cho. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):175 - 184.
Robin W. Lovin & Frank E. Reynolds (1986). Introduction. Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (1):48-60.
Aaron Stalnaker (2005). Comparative Religious Ethics and the Problem of “Human Nature”. Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):187-224.
Eske Møllgaard (2007). An Introduction to Daoist Thought: Action, Language, and Ethics in Zhuangzi. Routledge.
Kevin Schilbrack (2002). Teaching Comparative Religious Ethics: A Review Essay. [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 30 (2):295 - 312.
Ronald M. Green & Charles H. Reynolds (1986). Cosmogony and the "Questions of Ethics". Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (1):139 - 156.
Aaron Stalnaker (2008). Judging Others: History, Ethics, and the Purposes of Comparison. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):425-444.
Timothy P. Jackson (1999). Naturalism, Formalism, and Supernaturalism: Moral Epistemology and Comparative Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (3):477 - 506.
Robin W. Lovin & Frank Reynolds (eds.) (1985). Cosmogony and Ethical Order: New Studies in Comparative Ethics. University of Chicago Press.
David Little (1981). The Present State of the Comparative Study of Religious Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 9 (2):210 - 227.
Thomas A. Lewis (2010). Ethnography, Anthropology, and Comparative Religious Ethics: Or Ethnography and the Comparative Religious Ethics Local. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (3):395-403.
Roderick Hindery (2008). Comparative Ethics, Ideologies, and Critical Thought. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (2):215-231.
Barbara Hilkert Andolsen (1997). Religious Ethics and "The Struggle of the Common Life": A Response to Ronald M. Green's Review of the "Journal of Religious Ethics". Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (3):239-252.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads6 ( #461,678 of 1,796,225 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #468,795 of 1,796,225 )
How can I increase my downloads?