|Abstract||The "moral justification" is supposed to be that capturing soldiers in a cross border raid, and killing others, is an outrageous crime. We know, for certain, that Israel, the United States and other Western governments, as well as the mainstream of articulate Western opinion, do not believe a word of that. Sufficient evidence is their tolerance for many years of US backed Israeli crimes in Lebanon, including four invasions before this one, occupation in violation of Security Council orders for 22 years, and regular killings and abductions. To mention just one question that every journal should be answering: When did Nasrallah assume a leadership role? Answer: When the Rabin government escalated its crimes in Lebanon, murdering Sheikh Abbas Mussawi and his wife and child with missiles fired from a US helicopter. Nasrallah was chosen as his successor. Only one of innumerable cases. There is, after all, a good reason why last February, 70% of Lebanese called for the capture of Israeli soldiers for prisoner exchange.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Ruth Linn (2002). Soldiers with Conscience Never Die--They Are Just Ignored by Their Society. Moral Disobedience in the Israel Defense Forces. Journal of Military Ethics 1 (2):57-76.
Uri Benzion, Shosh Shahrabani & Tal Shavit (2008). Emotions and Perceived Risks After the 2006 Israel–Lebanon War. Mind and Society 8 (1):21-41.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,297 of 722,713 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,713 )
How can I increase my downloads?