The Current Bombings: Behind the Rhetoric
| Abstract | There is a regime of international law and international order, binding on all states, based on the UN Charter and subsequent resolutions and World Court decisions. In brief, the threat or use of force is banned unless explicitly authorized by the Security Council after it has determined that peaceful means have failed, or in selfdefense against "armed attack" (a narrow concept) until the Security Council acts. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Michael N. Schmitt * (2004). The Legality of Operation Iraqi Freedom Under International Law. Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):82-104.
Sean D. Murphy (2013). Jus Ad Bellum, Values, and the Contemporary Structure of International Law. Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (1):20-26.
John W. Lango (2009). Global Policy and the United Nations. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):105-115.
M. Kahler (2011). Legitimacy, Humanitarian Intervention, and International Institutions. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):20-45.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-12-22Total downloads4 ( #178,675 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |

