The conserved quantity theory of causation and closed systems
Philosophy of Science 70 (3):510-530 (2003)
| Abstract | Advocates of the conserved quantity (CQ) theory of causation have their own peculiar problem with conservation laws. Since they analyze causal process and interaction in terms of conserved quantities that are in turn defined as physical quantities governed by conservation laws, they must formulate conservation laws in a way that does not invoke causation, or else circularity threatens. In this paper I will propose an adequate formulation of a conservation law that serves CQ theorists' purpose. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Phil Dowe (2000). The Conserved Quantity Theory Defended. Theoria 15 (1):11-31.
AgustÃn Vicente (2002). The Localism of the Conserved Quantity Theory. Theoria 45 (563):571.
Tracy Lupher (2009). A Physical Critique of Physical Causation. Synthese 167 (1):67 - 80.
Wesley C. Salmon (1997). Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques. Philosophy of Science 64 (3):461-477.
Phil Dowe (2004). Causation and Misconnections. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):926-931.
Phil Dowe (2000). Physical Causation. Cambridge University Press.
Christopher Hitchcock (2009). Problems for the Conserved Quantity Theory. The Monist 92 (1):72-93.
Phil Dowe (2000). The Conserved Quantity Theory Defended. Theoria 15 (1):11-31.
Max Kistler (1998). Reducing Causality to Transmission. Erkenntnis 48 (1):1-25.
Sungho Choi (2002). Causation and Gerrymandered World Lines: A Critique of Salmon. Philosophy of Science 69 (1):105-117.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads34 ( #35,263 of 548,976 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,976 )How can I increase my downloads? |

