The Role of Spiritual Well-Being and Materialism in Determining Consumers' Ethical Beliefs: An Empirical Study with Australian Consumers [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 113 (1):61-79 (2013)
|Abstract||A survey was conducted to investigate the relationship of Australian consumers’ lived (experienced) spiritual well-being and materialism with the various dimensions of consumer ethics. Spiritual well-being is composed of four domains—personal, communal, transcendental and environmental well-being. All four domains were examined in relation to the various dimensions of consumers’ ethical beliefs (active/illegal dimension, passive dimension, active/legal dimension, ‘no harm, no foul’ dimension and ‘doing good’/recycling dimension). The results indicated that lived communal well-being was negatively related to perceptions of the active/illegal dimension and the passive dimension and was positively related to perceptions of the ‘no harm, no foul’ dimension and the ‘doing good’/recycling dimension. Lived personal well-being was negatively related to perceptions of the active/illegal dimension and was positively related to perceptions of the ‘no harm, no foul’ dimension and the ‘doing good’/recycling dimension. Lived transcendental well-being was negatively related to perceptions of the passive dimension, the active/legal dimension and the ‘no harm, no foul’ dimension. Lived environmental well-being was negatively related to perceptions of the active/legal dimension and the ‘no harm, no foul’ dimension. The findings also indicated that materialism was positively associated with perceptions of actively benefiting from illegal actions, passively benefiting at the expense of the seller, actively benefiting from questionable but legal actions and benefiting from ‘no harm, no foul’ actions. Public policy implications of the findings and opportunities for future research are discussed|
|Keywords||Spiritual well-being Materialism Consumer ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bahtışen Kavak, Eda Gürel, Canan Eryiğit & Öznur Özkan Tektaş (2009). Examining the Effects of Moral Development Level, Self-Concept, and Self-Monitoring on Consumers' Ethical Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):115 - 135.
Chun-Chen Huang, Long-Chuan Lu, Ching-Sing You & Szu-Wei Yen (2012). The Impacts of Ethical Ideology, Materialism, and Selected Demographics on Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Study in China. Ethics and Behavior 22 (4):315 - 331.
Ziad Swaidan, Scott J. Vitell & Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas (2003). Consumer Ethics: Determinants of Ethical Beliefs of African Americans. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 46 (2):175 - 186.
BaoChun Zhao & ShanShan Xu (2013). Does Consumer Unethical Behavior Relate to Birthplace? Evidence From China. Journal of Business Ethics 113 (3):475-488.
Scott J. Vitell, James R. Lumpkin & Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas (1991). Consumer Ethics: An Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of Elderly Consumers. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (5):365 - 375.
Claire Petitmengin (2007). Towards the Source of Thoughts: The Gestural and Transmodal Dimension of Lived Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (3):54-82.
Scott J. Vitell, Joseph G. P. Paolillo & Jatinder J. Singh (2006). The Role of Money and Religiosity in Determining Consumers' Ethical Beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (2):117 - 124.
Fernando Bárcena, Fernando Gil & Gonzalo Jover (1993). The Ethical Dimension of Teaching: A Review and a Proposal. Journal of Moral Education 22 (3):241-252.
Tor Sandqvist (2000). On Why the Best Should Always Meet. Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):287-313.
Mohammed Y. A. Rawwas (1996). Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of the Ethical Beliefs of Austrian Consumers. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 15 (9):1009 - 1019.
Guillermo Foladori, Noela Invernizzi & Edgar Záyago (2009). Two Dimensions of the Ethical Problems Related to Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 3 (2):121-127.
Long-Chuan Lu & Chia-Ju Lu (2010). Moral Philosophy, Materialism, and Consumer Ethics: An Exploratory Study in Indonesia. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 94 (2):193 - 210.
Pola B. Gupta, Stephen J. Gould & Bharath Pola (2004). “To Pirate or Not to Pirate”: A Comparative Study of the Ethical Versus Other Influences on the Consumer's Software Acquisition-Mode Decision. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 55 (3):255 - 274.
Sungchul Choi & Alex Ng (2011). Environmental and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability and Price Effects on Consumer Responses. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):269-282.
Scott J. Vitell & James Muncy (1992). Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ethical Judgments of the Final Consumer. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (8):585 - 597.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-04-03
Total downloads1 ( #292,381 of 739,336 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,336 )
How can I increase my downloads?