Women and globalization: Ethical dimensions of knowledge transfer in global organizations [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1):53 - 61 (2008)
The topic of women and globalization raises fundamental questions on the impact of globalization on women, ethnic minorities and other socio-demographically under-represented actors in global organizations. This article seeks to integrate theories of procedural justice, psychological contracts, motivation and psychological ownership in knowledge transfer in global organizations, and the implications for women, and other under-represented actors. Our analysis concurs with current research on the need for a relativist perspective in business ethics research and one that encompasses the critical processes of exchange from a cognitive perspective. Our contribution is to show that globalization is a complex process, that has different impacts on actors, an impact that can vary widely depending on, whether the actors are in a dominant situation, or as in the case of women and ethnic minorities, in a relatively socio-demographic and geo-politically under represented situation.
|Keywords||women socio-demographic geo-political psychological contracts procedural justice intrinsic motivation knowledge transfer|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
E. Allan Lind & Tom R. Tyler (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Robin S. Snell & Neil C. Herndon (2004). Hong Kong's Code of Ethics Initiative: Some Differences Between Theory and Practice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 51 (1):75-89.
Gordon W. Allport & Milton Harrington (1938). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. Ethics 49 (1):105-107.
John Tsalikis, Bruce Seaton & Philip L. Shepherd (2001). Relativism in Ethical Research: A Proposed Model and Mode of Inquiry. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 32 (3):231 - 246.
Citations of this work BETA
Alejandra Marin, Ronald K. Mitchell & Jae Hwan Lee (2015). The Vulnerability and Strength Duality in Ethnic Business: A Model of Stakeholder Salience and Social Capital. Journal of Business Ethics 130 (2):271-289.
Similar books and articles
Ana Marta González (2003). Ethics in Global Business and in a Plural Society. Journal of Business Ethics 44 (1):23 - 36.
Brooke A. Ackerly (2009). Feminist Theory, Global Gender Justice, and the Evaluation of Grant Making. Philosophical Topics 37 (2):179-198.
Chong Ju Choi, Tarek Ibrahim Eldomiaty & Sae Won Kim (2007). Consumer Trust, Social Marketing and Ethics of Welfare Exchange. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (1):17 - 23.
J. I. A. Rowney & A. R. Cahoon (1990). Individual and Organizational Characteristics of Women in Managerial Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (4-5):293 - 316.
Beverly Dawn Metcalfe (2008). Women, Management and Globalization in the Middle East. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (1):85 - 100.
Alison M. Jaggar (2002). Vulnerable Women and Neo-Liberal Globalization: Debt Burdens Undermine Women's Health in the Global South. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (6):425-440.
Marina Prieto-Carrón (2008). Women Workers, Industrialization, Global Supply Chains and Corporate Codes of Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (1):5 - 17.
R. J. Burke & C. A. McKeen (1990). Mentoring in Organizations: Implications for Women. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 9 (4-5):317 - 332.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #110,295 of 1,790,190 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #320,604 of 1,790,190 )
How can I increase my downloads?