Report a bug on this page | Sign in | Create an account
 
PhilPapers home blank

Online research in philosophy


Entries: 207,539  New this week: 176
blank
 General search   Category finder 
advanced search | help | use + and * as usual.
Type words to match in category names
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?

Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.

  • D. Christensen (1992). Causal Powers and Conceptual Connections. Analysis 52 (3):163-8.
    Externalism and Mental Causation in Philosophy of Mind
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this article  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar
    5 downloads  |  Added to index:2009-01-27  |  Mark as duplicate |  Delete from index


Discussion of D. Christensen, Causal powers and conceptual connections
Other forums | There are no threads in this forum | Start a new thread First post Latest post Total
Nothing in this forum yet.


Similar books and articles
  • 73.4Robert A. Wilson (1992). Individualism, Causal Powers, and Explanation. Philosophical Studies 68 (2):103-39.
    Externalism and Mental Causation in Philosophy of Mind
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this article  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: springerlink.com   | Scholar | More..
  • 64.8Toby Handfield (2008). Humean Dispositionalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (1):113 – 126.
    Humean metaphysics is characterized by a rejection of necessary connections between distinct existences. Dispositionalists claim that there are basic causal powers. The existence of such properties is widely held to be incompatible with the Humean rejection of necessary connections. In this paper I present a novel theory of causal powers that vindicates the dispositionalist claim that causal powers are basic, without embracing brute necessary connections. The key assumptions of the theory are that there are natural types of causal processes, and (...) that manifestations of powers are identified with certain kinds of causal processes. From these assumptions, the modal features of powers are explained in terms of internal relations between powers themselves and the process-types in which powers are manifested. (shrink)
    Humeanism and Nonhumeanism about Laws in Metaphysics
    Essentialism and De Re Modality, Misc in Metaphysics
    Powers in Metaphysics
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this article  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation  | Other links: informaworld.com   | Scholar | More..
  • 62.2Rachel Cooper (2007). Realism About Causality in Philosophy. Meaning, Truth and Causal Explanation: The Humean Condition Revisited / Christopher Norris; Aristotelian Powers / Charlotte Witt; Powers, Dispositions, Properties / Stephan Mumford; Inessential Aristotle: Powers Without Essences / Anjan Chravartty; Causal Exclusion and Evolved Emergent Properties / Alexander Bird; Are There Natural Kinds in Psychology? In Ruth Groff (ed.), Revitalizing Causality: Realism About Causality in Philosophy and Social Science. Routledge.
    Aristotle in Ancient Greek Philosophy
    In my reading list   |  Discuss this article  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  
     
    My bibliography  |
     
    Export citation | Scholar | More..




  • Applied ethicsEpistemologyMeta-ethicsMetaphysicsNormative ethics
    Philosophy of biologyPhilosophy of languagePhilosophy of mindPhilosophy of religionMore ...
    Home | Blog | New books and articles | Philosophy journals | Forums | The Categorization Project | About PhilPapers | Contact us
    Sponsored by the Joint Information Systems Committee as part of the
    Information Environment Programme

    Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
    All rights reserved by David Bourget and David Chalmers where applicable.

    loading ..