David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 52 (1):88-120 (2007)
Galen is well known as a critic of Stoicism, mainly for his massive attack on Stoic (or at least, Chrysippean) psychology in "On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato" (PHP) 2-5. Galen attacks both Chrysippus' location of the ruling part of the psyche in the heart and his unified or monistic picture of human psychology. However, if we consider Galen's thought more broadly, this has a good deal in common with Stoicism, including a (largely) physicalist conception of psychology and a strongly teleological view of natural entities, shared features which are acknowledged in several treatises outside "PHP." Why, then, is Galen such a remorseless and negative critic of Stoicism in "PHP"? Various factors are relevant, including the shaping influence on Galen of the Platonic-Aristotelian (part-based) psychological framework. But, it is suggested here, an important underlying factor is the contrast between two ways of thinking about the part-whole relationship, a 'composition' and a 'structure' approach or an atomistic and holistic approach. This contrast is most evident and explicit in one section of "PHP" 5, where Galen, criticising Chrysippus' holistic psychology, denies that the Stoic thinker is entitled to use the concept of part at all. But the contrast is also seen as pervading Galen's response to Stoic thought more generally, in "PHP" and elsewhere, in ways that inform his explicit disagreements with Stoic theory. Stoicism is presented here as having a consistently 'structure' (or holistic) approach. Galen's approach is seen as more mixed, sometimes sharing, or aspiring towards, a holistic picture, and yet sometimes (especially in "PHP" 5), adopting a strongly 'composition' or atomistic standpoint. This (partial) contrast in conceptual frameworks is presented as offering a new perspective on Galen's critique of Stoic psychology in "PHP" and on his relationship to Stoic thought more generally
|Keywords||PSYCHOLOGY STOICISM HOLISM GALEN PART-WHOLE RELATIONSHIP|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Vivian Nutton (2008). The Fortunes of Galen. In R. J. Hankinson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge University Press.
Galen (1964). Galen's Institutio Logica. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press.
Helen King (1992). Galen's Method Fridolf Kudlien, Richard J. Durling (Edd.): Galen's Method of Healing. Proceedings of the 1982 Galen Symposium. (Studies in Ancient Medicine, 1.) Pp. Viii + 205. Leiden, New York, Copenhagen and Cologne: Brill, 1991. Fl. 110. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (01):170-171.
Brad Inwood & Lloyd P. Gerson (eds.) (2008). The Stoics Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia. Hackett Pub. Co., Inc..
Galen (1977). Galen on Language and Ambiguity: An English Translation of Galen's "de Captionibus " with Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Brill Academic Pub.
Galen (1998). Galen: On Antecedent Causes. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Boylan (2007). Galen: On Blood, the Pulse, and the Arteries. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 40 (2):207 - 230.
Christopher Gill (2007). Galen and the Stoics: Mortal Enemies or Blood Brothers? Phronesis 52 (1):88-120.
Christopher Gill (2010). Naturalistic Psychology in Galen and Stoicism. Oxford University Press.
G. E. R. Lloyd (2008). Galen and His Contemporaries. In R. J. Hankinson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #91,473 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #246,076 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?