David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 49 (3):266 - 294 (2004)
To most interpreters, the case seems to be clear: Plotinus identifies matter and evil, as he bluntly states in Enn. 1.8 that 'last matter' is 'evil', and even 'evil itself'. In this paper, I challenge this view: how and why should Plotinus have thought of matter, the sense-making ἔσχατον of his derivational ontology from the One and Good, evil? A rational reconstruction of Plotinus's tenets should neither accept the paradox that evil comes from Good, nor shirk the arduous task of interpreting Plotinus's texts on evil as a fitting part of his philosophy on the whole. Therefore, I suggest a reading of evil in Plotinus as the outcome of an incongruent interaction of matter and soul, maintaining simultaneously that neither soul nor matter are to be considered as bad or evil. When Plotinus calls matter evil, he does so metonymically denoting matter's totally passive potentiality as perceived by the toiling soul trying to act upon it as a form-bringer. As so often, Plotinus is speaking quoad nos here rather than referring to 'matter per se' (for Plotinus, somewhat of an oxymoron) which, as mere potentiality (and nothing else) is not nor can be evil. In short: matter is no more evil than the melancholy evening sky is melancholy -- not in itself (for it isn't), but as to its impression on us who contemplate it. As I buttress this view, it will also become clear that matter cannot tritely be considered to be the αὐτὸ κακόν as a prima facie-reading of Enn. 1.8 might powerfully suggest, but that the αὐτὸ κακόν, far from being a principle of its own, has to be interpreted within the dynamics of Plotinus's philosophical thinking as a unique, though numerously applicable flaw-pattern for all the single κακά (hence the Platonic αὐτό). To conclude, I shall offer a short outlook on the consistency of this interpretation with Plotinus's teaching on the soul and with the further Neoplatonic development of the doctrine of evil
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Kevin Corrigan (1996). Plotinus' Theory of Matter-Evil and the Question of Substance: Plato, Aristototle, and Alexander of Aphrodisias. Peeters.
Denis O'Brien (1999). La matière chez Plotin: son origine, sa nature. Phronesis 44 (1):45-71.
Denis O'Brien (1999). La matière chez Plotin: son origine, sa nature. Phronesis 44 (1):45 - 71.
Gary M. Gurtler (1998). Plotinus (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (1):128-130.
Denis OBrien (2011). Plotinus on the Making of Matter Part I: The Identity of Darkness. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (1):6-57.
Jan Opsomer (2001). Proclus Vs Plotinus on Matter (De Mal. Subs. 30-7 ). Phronesis 46 (2):154-188.
Jan Opsomer (2001). Proclus Vs Plotinus on Matter ("De Mal. Subs." 30-7). Phronesis 46 (2):154 - 188.
Rafael Pangilinan (2010). Evil in Plotinus’ Hypostases of Being. Philosophy Pathways (150).
Christian Schäfer (2004). Matter in Plotinus's Normative Ontology. Phronesis 49 (3):266-294.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #105,173 of 1,790,117 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #122,965 of 1,790,117 )
How can I increase my downloads?