Meinong und supervaluation
In Arkadiusz Chrudzimski & Wolfgang Huemer (eds.), Phenomenology and Analysis: Essays on Central European Philosophy. Ontos (2004)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Karel Lambert (1983). Meinong and the Principle of Independence: Its Place in Meinong's Theory of Objects and its Significance in Contemporary Philosophical Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Karel Lambert (1974). Impossible Objects. Inquiry 17 (1-4):303 – 314.
Philip Kremer & Michael Kremer (2003). Some Supervaluation-Based Consequence Relations. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):225-244.
Alexius Meinong (1899). Über Gegenstände Höherer Ordnung Und Deren Verhältnisse Zur Inneren Wahrnehmung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie Und Physiologie Der Sinnesorgane 21:182--272.
Carlo Ierna (2009). Relations in the Early Works of Meinong and Husserl. Meinong Studies 3:7-36.
Philip Kremer (2008). Supervaluation Fixed-Point Logics of Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (5).
A. K. Jorgensen (2002). Meinong's Much Maligned Modal Moment. Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):95-118.
K. A. (2002). Meinong's Much Maligned Modal Moment. Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):95-118.
Michael Morreau (1999). Supervaluation Can Leave Truth-Value Gaps After All. Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):148-156.
Peter Loptson (2009). Contra Meinong. In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". Routledge.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

