David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 34 (2):203 - 224 (2006)
The doctrine of restraint is the claim that citizens and legislators ought to restrain themselves from making political decisions solely on religious grounds. That doctrine is normally construed as a general constraint on religious arguments: an exclusively religious rationale "as such" is an inappropriate basis for a political decision, particularly a coercive political decision. However, the most common arguments for the doctrine of restraint fail to show that citizens and legislators ought to obey the doctrine of restraint, as we can see by reflecting on those arguments as they bear on the Agapic Pacifist's rationale for denying that even legitimate political authorities may use lethal military force.
|Keywords||public reason doctrine of restraint pacifism liberalism religion and politics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Rawls (1993). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Christopher J. Eberle (2005). Religious Conviction in Liberal Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Soren Kierkegaard, David F. Swenson, Lilliam Marvin Swenson & Douglas V. Steere (1947). Works of Love. Philosophical Review 56 (1):109-112.
Lisa Sowle Cahill (1994). Love Your Enemies Discipleship, Pacifism, and Just War Theory. Fortress Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
R. B. Talisse (2012). Religion, Respect and Eberle's Agapic Pacifist. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (3):313-325.
Selmer Bringsjord (1989). Christianity and Pacifism. Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):88-94.
Christopher J. Eberle & Rick Rubel (2012). Religious Conviction in the Profession of Arms. Journal of Military Ethics 11 (3):171-185.
Richard Routley (1984). I. On the Alleged Inconsistency, Moral Insensitivity and Fanaticism of Pacifism. Inquiry 27 (1-4):117 – 136.
Carlo Filice (1992). Pacifism. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:119-153.
A. Ferguson (2006). No Just War for the Empire. Radical Philosophy Today 2006:27-37.
Lisa Sowle Cahill (1992). Theological Contexts of Just War Theory and Pacifism: A Response to J. Bryan Hehir. Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (2):259 - 265.
Laura Duhan Kaplan (1992). On the Compatibility of Pacifism and Care. Hypatia 7 (1):133 - 134.
Gregory M. Reichberg (2010). Thomas Aquinas Between Just War and Pacifism. Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (2):219-241.
Neil C. Manson (2012). Epistemic Restraint and the Vice of Curiosity. Philosophy 87 (02):239-259.
J. Kellenberger (1987). A Defense of Pacifism. Faith and Philosophy 4 (2):129-148.
Zandra Wagoner (2010). Deliberation, Reason, and Indigestion: Response to Daniel Dombrowski's Rawls and Religion: The Case for Political Liberalism. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (3):179-195.
Andrew Fiala (2009). Pacifism and Just War Theory After 9/11. In Matthew J. Morgan (ed.), The Impact of 9/11 on Religion and Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan
D. Miall Edwards (1932). Christianity and Philosophy. Edinburgh, T. & T. Clark.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads26 ( #142,242 of 1,789,925 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #263,819 of 1,789,925 )
How can I increase my downloads?