Reply to Burgess and to Read

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (2):195-200 (1986)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,653
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Stephen Read (1983). Burgess on Relevance: A Fallacy Indeed. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (4):473-481.
    John P. Burgess (1984). Read on Relevance: A Rejoinder. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25 (3):217-223.
    Daniel D. Hutto (2006). Misreadings, Clarifications and Reminders: A Reply to Hutchinson and Read. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (4):561 – 567.
    Kathleen Cranley Glass (1995). Reply to Dr. Ellen Burgess. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (2):212-212.
    H. O. Mounce (2003). Reply to Read and Deans. Philosophical Investigations 26 (3):269–270.
    John Wild (1942). In Reply to Mr. Read. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2 (3):410-413.
    Søren Riis (2013). Reframing Architecture. Foundations of Science 18 (1):205-211.
    Brian Weatherson (2003). Epistemicism, Parasites, and Vague Names. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):276 – 279.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-08-24

    Total downloads

    2 ( #232,265 of 548,984 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums