Semantics without reference

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31 (3):437-461 (1990)
A theory of reference may be either an analysis of reference or merely an account of the correct use of the verb "refer". If we define the validity of arguments in the standard way, in terms of assignments of individuals and sets to the nonlogical vocabulary of the language, then we will be committed to seeking an analysis of reference. Those who prefer a metalinguistic account, therefore, will desire an alternative to standard semantics. One alternative is the Quinean conception of logical validity as essentially a matter of logical form. Another alternative is Leblanc's truth-value semantics. But these prove to be either inadequate for purposes of metatheory or philosophically unsatisfactory. This paper shows how validity (i.e., semantic consequence) may be defined in a way that avoid the problems facing these other alternatives to standard semantics and also permits a metalinguistic account of reference. The validity of arguments is treated as a matter of logical form, but validity for forms is defined on analogy with the definition of semantic consequence in truth-value semantics. (A more radical kind of semantics without reference is the context logical approach represented in several of my other publications.)
Keywords logical validity  reference
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1093635507
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 21,439
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Gauker (1991). Mental Content and the Division of Epistemic Labour. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (September):302-18.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Christopher Gauker (2005). Semantics for Deflationists. In J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), Deflationism and Paradox. Oxford University Press
Robert Stalnaker (1998). Los Nombres y la Referencia: Semantica y Metasemantica. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):7-19.
Christopher Gauker (2015). The Illusion of Semantic Reference. In Andrea Bianchi (ed.), On Reference. Oxford University Press 11-39.
Tomis Kapitan (1982). On the Concept of Material Consequence. History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (2):193-211.
Colin McLarty (1993). Anti-Foundation and Self-Reference. Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (1):19 - 28.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

62 ( #71,269 of 1,911,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #97,988 of 1,911,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.