Philosophy of Science 57 (4):644-662 (1990)
|Abstract||The main appeal of the currently popular "bootstrap" account of confirmation developed by Clark Glymour is that it seems to provide an account of evidential relevance. This account has, however, had severe problems; and Glymour has revised his original account in an attempt to solve them. I argue that this attempt fails completely, and that any similar modifications must also fail. If the problems can be solved, it will only be by radical revisions which involve jettisoning bootstrapping's basic approach to theories. Finally, I argue that there is little reason to think that even such drastic modifications will lead to a satisfactory account of relevance|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jonathan Weisberg (2010). Bootstrapping in General*†. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (3):525-548.
Ken Gemes (2006). Bootstrapping and Content Parts. Erkenntnis 64 (3):345 - 370.
Michael G. Titelbaum (2010). Tell Me You Love Me: Bootstrapping, Externalism, and No-Lose Epistemology. Philosophical Studies 149 (1):119–134.
David Lauer (2009). Genuine Normativity, Expressive Bootstrapping, and Normative Phenomenalism. Etica and Politica / Ethics & Politics 11 (1):321-350.
Aron Edidin (1981). Glymour on Confirmation. Philosophy of Science 48 (2):292-307.
David Grünberg (2001). Bootstrapping and the Problem of Testing Quantitative Theoretical Hypotheses. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:143-150.
Madison Culler (1995). Beyond Bootstrapping: A New Account of Evidential Relevance. Philosophy of Science 62 (4):561-579.
Sam Mitchell (1995). Toward a Defensible Bootstrapping. Philosophy of Science 62 (2):241-260.
David Christensen (1983). Glymour on Evidential Relevance. Philosophy of Science 50 (3):471-481.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #53,914 of 549,550 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?