- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Most Human Human: What Talking with Computers Teaches Us About What It Means to Be Alive
Doubleday (2011)
Abstract
A provocative exploration of how computers are reshaping ideas about what it means to be human profiles the annual Turing Test to assess a computer's capacity for thought while analyzing related philosophical, biological and moral issues.
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
What does the Turing test really mean? And how many human beings (including Turing) could pass?Tyler Cowen & Michelle Dawson - unknown
Imitation versus communication: Testing for human-like intelligence.Jamie Cullen - 2009 - Minds and Machines 19 (2):237-254.
So you think you're human?: a brief history of humankind.Felipe Fernández-Armesto - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Are you a machine?: the brain, the mind, and what it means to be human.Eliezer J. Sternberg - 2007 - Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.
Creativity, the Turing test, and the (better) Lovelace test.Selmer Bringsjord, P. Bello & David A. Ferrucci - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):3-27.
Making the right identification in the Turing test.Saul Traiger - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572.
Rethinking human nature: a multidisciplinary approach.Malcolm A. Jeeves (ed.) - 2011 - Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
Alan Turing and the mathematical objection.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2003 - Minds and Machines 13 (1):23-48.
Undecidability in the imitation game.Y. Sato & T. Ikegami - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (2):133-43.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-12-21
Downloads
4 (#1,556,099)
6 months
1 (#1,459,555)
2010-12-21
Downloads
4 (#1,556,099)
6 months
1 (#1,459,555)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
On the Claim that a Table-Lookup Program Could Pass the Turing Test.Drew McDermott - 2014 - Minds and Machines 24 (2):143-188.
Language and Being Human in Technology.J. M. van der Laan - 2012 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 32 (3):241-252.
Toward the search for the perfect blade runner: a large-scale, international assessment of a test that screens for “humanness sensitivity”.Robert Epstein, Maria Bordyug, Ya-Han Chen, Yijing Chen, Anna Ginther, Gina Kirkish & Holly Stead - forthcoming - AI and Society:1-21.
On the Diversity of the Cognition Disciplines and the Development of A Unifying Philosophy of Information.Nolan Hemmatazad - 2016 - Metaphilosophy 47 (2):199-213.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-df5c4697d-9mmqm uwo