The Myth of Property: Toward an Egalitarian Theory of Ownership
OUP USA (1994)
| Abstract | The Myth of Property is the first book-length study to focus directly on the variable and complex structure of ownership. It critically analyses what it means to own something, and it takes familiar debates about distributive justice and recasts them into discussions of the structure of ownership. The traditional notion of private property assumed by both defenders and opponents of that system is criticized and exposed as a "myth." The book then puts forward a new theory of what it means to own something, one that will be important for any theory of distributive justice. This new approach more adequately reveals the disparate social and individual values that property ownership serves to promote. The study has importance for understanding the reform of capitalist and welfare state systems, as well as the institution of market economies in former socialist states, for the view developed here makes the traditional dichotomy between private ownership capitalism and public ownership socialism obsolete. This new approach to ownership also places egalitarian principles of distributive justice in a new light and challenges critics to clarify aspects of property ownership worth protecting against calls for greater equality. The book closes by showing how defenders of egalitarianism can make use of some of the ideas and values that traditionally made private property appear to be such a pervasive human institution. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | $86.40 used (22% off) $103.53 new (6% off) Amazon page | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 9780195085945 0195085949 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Hugh Breakey (2011). Property, Persons, Boundaries: The Argument From Other-Ownership. Social Theory and Practice 37 (2):189-210.
David Schmidtz (1995). Book Review:The Myth of Property: Toward an Egalitarian Theory of Ownership. John Christman. [REVIEW] Ethics 106 (1):200-.
Jeremy Waldron (1990). The Right to Private Property. Clarendon Press.
Lea Ypi (2011). Self-Ownership and the State: A Democratic Critique. Ratio 24 (1):91-106.
Eric Mack (2002). Self-Ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism: Part II: Challenges to the Self-Ownership Thesis. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (2):237-276.
Meir Dan-Cohen (2001). The Value of Ownership. Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (4):404–434.
Lloyd P. Gerson (2012). Who Owns What? Some Reflections on the Foundation of Political Philosophy. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):81-105.
John E. Roemer (1994). Egalitarian Perspectives: Essays in Philosophical Economics. Cambridge University Press.
Alex Shaw, Vivian Li & Kristina R. Olson (forthcoming). Children Apply Principles of Physical Ownership to Ideas. Cognitive Science.
C. Fabre (2002). Justice, Fairness, and World Ownership. Law and Philosophy 21 (3):249-273.
Peter Vallentyne (2001). Self-Ownership. In Laurence Becker & Charlotte Becker (eds.), Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd edition. Garland Publishing.
Karl Widerquist (2009). A Dilemma for Libertarianism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):43-72.
Richard J. Arneson (2010). Self-Ownership and World Ownership: Against Left-Libertarianism. Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (1):168-194.
James Wilson (2010). Ontology and the Regulation of Intellectual Property. The Monist 93 (3):450-463.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-01-31Total downloads8 ( #123,218 of 549,197 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,197 )How can I increase my downloads? |

