Three questions about Leplin's reliabilism
Philosophical Studies 134 (1):43 - 50 (2007)
| Abstract | Jarrett Leplin’s paper is multifaceted; it’s rich with ideas, and I won’t even try to touch on all of them. Instead, I’d like to raise three questions about the paper: one about its definition of reliable method, one about its solution to the generality problem, and one about its answer to clairvoyance-type objections. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJuan Comesaña (2006). A Well-Founded Solution to the Generality Problem. Philosophical Studies 129 (1):27 - 47.
Jarrett Leplin (2007). Reply to Christensen. Philosophical Studies 134 (1):51 - 52.
Nancy J. Nersessian (1991). The Method to "Meaning": A Reply to Leplin. Philosophy of Science 58 (4):678-686.
Samir Okasha (1997). Laudan and Leplin on Empirical Equivalence. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):251-256.
Michael Levin (1997). You Can Always Count on Reliabilism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):607 - 617.
Peter Baumann (2009). Reliabilism—Modal, Probabilistic or Contextualist. Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):77-89.
Michael Levin (1997). You Can Always Count on Reliabilism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):607-617.
J. Leplin (ed.) (1984). Scientific Realism. University of California.
Dudley Shapere (1991). Leplin on Essentialism. Philosophy of Science 58 (4):655-677.
Husain Sarkar (2000). Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (2):187 – 197.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads20 ( #61,442 of 549,005 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 549,005 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
