The Re-emergence of the Liberal-Communitarian Debate in Bioethics: Exercising Self-Determination and Participation in Biomedical Research
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (3):255-276 (2012)
|Abstract||Biomedical research has brought to the fore the issue of which rights and duties we have to each other and society. Several scholars have advocated reframing the notion of participation, arguing that we have a moral duty to participate in research from which we all benefit. However, less attention has been paid to how we justify and defend the concept of self-determination and what the implications are in a biomedical setting. The author discusses the value and importance of self-determination on the basis of the framework of the liberal-communitarian debate. Biobank research is used as an example of a project wherein, through our participation, we confirm our sense of belonging to society and acknowledge our mutual dependence on each other. We need a richer concept of self-determination that encompasses both liberal and communitarian insights in order to make sense of the value we attach to self-determination|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Douglas Low (1997). Merleau-Ponty and the Liberal/Communitarian Debate. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:357-386.
Judy Allen & Beverley Mcnamara (2011). Reconsidering the Value of Consent in Biobank Research. Bioethics 25 (3):155-166.
Mark Young & Andrew Sneddon (2011). Communitarian and Liberal Themes in Moral Agency and Education. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (1):105-120.
Charles W. Harvey (1994). Paradise Well Lost. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (1):9-14.
Jacquineau Azétsop & Stuart Rennie (2010). Principlism, Medical Individualism, and Health Promotion in Resource-Poor Countries: Can Autonomy-Based Bioethics Promote Social Justice and Population Health? Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 5 (1):1-10.
Louis W. Hodges (1996). Ruminations About the Communitarian Debate. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (3):133 – 139.
Inmaculada de Melo-Mart (2008). A Duty to Participate in Research: Does Social Context Matter? American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):28 – 36.
Antonio Casado Rochdaa & José Antonio Seoane (2008). Alternative Consent Models for Biobanks: The New Spanish Law on Biomedical Research. Bioethics 22 (8):440-447.
Aurora Plomer (2005). The Law and Ethics of Medical Research: International Bioethics and Human Rights. Cavendish.
Christopher Tollefsen (2008). Biomedical Research and Beyond: Expanding the Ethics of Inquiry. Routledge.
Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta & Annemiek Richters (2008). Embodied Subjects and Fragmented Objects: Women's Bodies, Assisted Reproduction Technologies and the Right to Self-Determination. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4).
David B. Resnik (2003). Exploitation in Biomedical Research. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (3):233--259.
Ari VanderWalde & Seth Kurzban (2011). Paying Human Subjects in Research: Where Are We, How Did We Get Here, and Now What? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):543-558.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-05-05
Total downloads1 ( #277,212 of 556,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?