David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 42 (3 & 4):411 – 437 (1999)
Heidegger's central concern is the question of being (Seinsfrage). The paper reconstructs this question at least for the young (pre- Kehre) Heidegger in the light of two interconnected hypotheses: (1) the substantial content of the question of being can be identified by seeing it as a response to (Marburg) neo-Kantianism; and (2) this content centres around the claim that, pace the neo-Kantians, 'epistemological' concerns are grounded in 'ontological' ones, for which reason 'ontology' must precede 'epistemology' as a form of philosophical inquiry. In section I the general position of (Marburg) neo-Kantianism is sketched. In section II the implications of the neo-Kantian position for the concepts of truth and reality, reason, and experience, are outlined; significant similarities to Sellars, Davidson, and Brandom are revealed. Finally, in section III Heidegger's analysis of everydayness is shown to yield a distinct critique of the neo-Kantian relativization of the concept of the real to the theoretically knowable. From this critique it emerges why Heidegger thinks that 'ontology' precedes 'epistemology'. The project of fundamental ontology marked by the question of being thus shows itself to be at least in part a response to the aporia of Marburg neo-Kantianism.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Carleton B. Christensen (2007). What Are the Categories in Sein Und Zeit? Brandom on Heidegger on Zuhandenheit. European Journal of Philosophy 15 (2):159–185.
Similar books and articles
Christian Lotz, McGrath, Sean. J., the Early Heidegger & Medieval Philosophy. Phenomenology for the Godforsaken, Washington: The Catholic University of America Press 2006, 268 Pages. [REVIEW]
William H. Smith (2007). Why Tugendhat's Critique of Heidegger's Concept of Truth Remains a Critical Problem. Inquiry 50 (2):156 – 179.
Ryan Hickerson (2009). Neglecting the Question of Being: Heidegger's Argument Against Husserl. Inquiry 52 (6):574 – 595.
Veronica Vasterling (2000). The Problem of Time: Heidegger's Deconstructive Reading of Kant in Volume 21. In Tom Rockmore (ed.), Heidegger, German Idealism and Neo-Kantianism.
Mikhail G. Katz & Thomas Mormann, Infinitesimals and Other Idealizing Completions in Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Mathematics.
Judy Deane Saltzman (1981). Paul Natorp's Philosophy of Religion Within the Marburg Neo-Kantian Tradition. Olms.
Stephan Käufer (2001). On Heidegger on Logic. Continental Philosophy Review 34 (4):455-476.
Jesús Adrián Escudero (2007). Heidegger Und Die Genealogie der Seinsfrage. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 11:49-55.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #100,507 of 1,789,998 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #424,764 of 1,789,998 )
How can I increase my downloads?