Conscience, moral truth, and moral errors: Some responses to Edmund Leites
Journal of Chinese Philosophy 2 (1):79-86 (1974)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn J. Hardt (2008). The Conscience Debate: Resources for Rapprochement From the Problem's Perceived Source. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):151-160.
Vasiliki Karavakou (2006). The Educational Demands of a Philosophical Theory of Moral Conscience in a Modern Democracy. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:65-71.
Joseph M. Grcic (1985). Democratic Capitalism: Developing a Conscience for the Corporation. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (2):145 - 150.
John J. Tilley (2009). Dismissive Replies to "Why Should I Be Moral?". Social Theory and Practice 35 (3):341–68.
Raja Halwani (2009). Ethicism, Interpretation, and Munich. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):71-87.
Cass R. Sunstein (2005). On Moral Intuitions and Moral Heuristics: A Response. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):565-570.
Edmund Leites (ed.) (1988). Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe. Editions De La Maison des Sciences De L'Homme.
Edmund Leites (1974). Conscience, Casuistry, and Moral Decision: Some Historical Perspectives. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 2 (1):41-58.
Edmund Leites (1974). Conscience and Moral Ignorance: Comments on Chung-Ying Cheng's 'Conscience, Mind and Individual in Chinese Philosophy'. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 2 (1):67-78.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
