Critical reflections on Rawlsian justice versus confucian justice

Journal of Chinese Philosophy 24 (4):417-426 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1540-6253.1997.tb00188.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Theories of Justice.Tom Campbell & Alejandra Mancilla (eds.) - 2012 - Ashgate.
Incentives and principles for individuals in rawls’ theory of justice.Alex Voorhoeve - 2005 - Ethics and Economics 3 (1):1-7.
Does confucian ethics integrate care ethics and justice ethics? The case of mencius.Chenyang Li - 2008 - Asian Philosophy 18 (1):69 – 82.
The Structure of a Rawlsian Theory of Just Work.Lars Lindblom - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):577-599.
Justice: The neglected argument and the pregnant vision.Xunwu Chen - 2009 - Asian Philosophy 19 (2):189 – 198.
Confucian and Rawlsian views of justice: A comparison.Ruiping Fan - 1997 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 24 (4):427-456.
Looking to Hume for justice: On the utility of Hume's view of justice for american health care reform.Larry R. Churchill - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (4):352 – 364.
The limits of Rawlsian justice.Roberto Alejandro - 1998 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Incentives and Principles for Individuals in Rawls's Theory of Justice.John Rawls - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
31 (#501,295)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chung-Ying Cheng
University of Hawaii

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references