David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 162 (2):359-378 (2013)
In this paper I assume that we have some intuitive knowledge—i.e. beliefs that amount to knowledge because they are based on intuitions. The question I take up is this: given that some intuition makes a belief based on it amount to knowledge, in virtue of what does it do so? We can ask a similar question about perception. That is: given that some perception makes a belief based on it amount to knowledge, in virtue of what does it do so? A natural idea about perception is that a perception makes a belief amount to knowledge in part by making you sensorily aware of the concrete objects it is about. The analogous idea about intuition is that an intuition makes a belief amount to knowledge in part by making you intellectually aware of the abstract objects it is about. I expand both ideas into fuller accounts of perceptual and intuitive knowledge, explain the main challenge to this sort of account of intuitive knowledge (i.e. the challenge of making sense of intellectual awareness), and develop a response to it.
|Keywords||intuition perception knowledge epistemology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jonathan Dancy (2004). Ethics Without Principles. Oxford University Press.
D. M. Armstrong (2004). Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge University Press.
Timothy Williamson (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Blackwell Pub..
Citations of this work BETA
David Bourget (2015). The Role of Consciousness in Grasping and Understanding. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (1):n/a-n/a.
Moti Mizrahi (2015). Three Arguments Against the Expertise Defense. Metaphilosophy 46 (1):52-64.
Moti Mizrahi (2014). Does the Method of Cases Rest on a Mistake? Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (2):183-197.
Elijah Chudnoff (2013). Is Intuition Based On Understanding? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (1):42-67.
Kris Mcdaniel (2014). Metaphysics, History, Phenomenology. Res Philosophica 91 (3):339-365.
Similar books and articles
Sarah McGrath (2004). Moral Knowledge by Perception. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):209–228.
Ernest Sosa (2010). Value Matters in Epistemology. Journal of Philosophy 107 (4):167-190.
David Galloway (1999). Seeing Sequences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):93-112.
J. L. Evans (1978/1979). Knowledge And Infallibility. St Martin's Press.
Keith Allen (2013). Locke and Sensitive Knowledge. Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (2):249-266.
Carol Mason Spicer (1996). Introduction. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (4):ix-x.
Jason Baehr (2009). Is There a Value Problem? In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Epistemic Value. Oxford University Press 42--59.
Marine Picon (2008). What is the Foundation of Knowledge ? Leibniz and the Amphibology of Intuition. In Marcelo Dascal (ed.), Leibniz : What kind of Rationalist ? Springer 213--227.
Steven Luper (2006). Dretske on Knowledge Closure. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3):379 – 394.
Elijah Chudnoff (2013). Awareness of Abstract Objects. Noûs 47 (4):706-726.
T. L. S. Sprigge (1997). Spinoza and Indexicals. Inquiry 40 (1):3 – 22.
H. A. Prichard (1950). Knowledge And Perception. Oxford University Press.
Douglas J. McDermid (2001). What is Direct Perceptual Knowledge? A Fivefold Confusion. Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):1-16.
Added to index2011-03-14
Total downloads389 ( #1,409 of 1,724,890 )
Recent downloads (6 months)45 ( #26,347 of 1,724,890 )
How can I increase my downloads?