Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||As neuroscience uncovers these and other mechanisms regulating choices and social behaviour, we cannot help but wonder whether anyone truly chooses anything (though see "Is the universe deterministic?"). As a result, profound questions about responsibility are inescapable, not just regarding criminal justice, but in the day-to-day business of life. Given that, I suggest that free will, as traditionally understood, needs modification. Because of its importance in society, any description of free will updated to fit what we know about the nervous system must also reflect our social need for a working concept of responsibility.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Thomas Pink (2004). Free Will: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Joseph Keim Campbell (2011). Free Will. Polity Press.
E. J. Coffman & Ted A. Warfield (2007). Alfred Mele's Metaphysical Freedom? Philosophical Explorations 10 (2):185 – 194.
Manuel Vargas (2009). Taking the Highway on Skepticism, Luck, and the Value of Responsibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2):249-265.
Nicole A. Vincent (2010). On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Galen Strawson (1998). Free Will. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
Elinor Mason (2005). Recent Work on Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Books 46 (4):343-353.
William Jaworski (2009). The Logic of How-Questions. Synthese 166 (1):133 - 155.
Elinor Mason (2005). Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Books 46 (4):343-353.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads414 ( #240 of 738,079 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #17,084 of 738,079 )
How can I increase my downloads?