The effects of management's preannouncement strategies on investors' judgments of the trustworthiness of management
Journal of Business Ethics 79 (4):423 - 444 (2008)
|Abstract||This paper examines the role of management’s earnings preannouncements on judgments about its trustworthiness by nonprofessional investors. We predict that management’s preannouncement decision and the resulting direction (e.g., favorable vs. unfavorable) of the earnings surprise influence investors’ ethical judgments about management’s trustworthiness; these judgments, in turn, are associated with investors’ other investment related judgments. We test our predictions in an experiment in which MBA students make investment-related judgments under four different preannouncement strategies. Consistent with our predictions, the results of our study show that managers’ preannouncement decisions are significantly associated with investors’ evaluations of management’s trustworthiness. Specifically, holding the size of the earnings surprise constant, we find that judgments of management’s trustworthiness are damaged more following (a) a negative as opposed to a positive earnings surprise, and (b) the release of a preannouncement compared to when management does not issue a preannouncement. Also consistent with our predictions, we find that evaluations of management’s trustworthiness are significantly and positively associated with judgments of the attractiveness of the firm’s equity as an investment. Based on our findings, we encourage further research to explore whether managers understand the trust implications associated with their preannouncement decisions and the extent to which this understanding influences their disclosure decisions.|
|Keywords||earnings preannouncements nonprofessional investor judgment trustworthiness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marilyn Fischer & Kenneth Rosenzweig (1995). Attitudes of Students and Accounting Practitioners Concerning the Ethical Acceptability of Earnings Management. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (6):433 - 444.
Fred Van Dyke (2005). Teaching Ethical Analysis in Environmental Management Decisions: A Process-Oriented Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):659-669.
Fred Dyke (2005). Teaching Ethical Analysis in Environmental Management Decisions: A Process-Oriented Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):659-669.
Anna M. Rose & Jacob M. Rose (2008). Management Attempts to Avoid Accounting Disclosure Oversight: The Effects of Trust and Knowledge on Corporate Directors' Governance Ability. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 83 (2):193 - 205.
Jeffrey S. Miller (2009). Opportunistic Disclosures of Earnings Forecasts and Non-GAAP Earnings Measures. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):3 - 10.
Gopal V. Krishnan & Linda M. Parsons (2008). Getting to the Bottom Line: An Exploration of Gender and Earnings Quality. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):65 - 76.
Steven E. Kaplan, James C. McElroy, Susan P. Ravenscroft & Charles B. Shrader (2007). Moral Judgment and Causal Attributions: Consequences of Engaging in Earnings Management. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 74 (2):149 - 164.
Steven E. Kaplan & Susan P. Ravenscroft (2004). The Reputation Effects of Earnings Management in the Internal Labor Market. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (3):453-478.
Steven E. Kaplan (2001). Ethically Related Judgments by Observers of Earnings Management. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (4):285 - 298.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,629 of 722,752 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,752 )
How can I increase my downloads?