David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophia 37 (4):565-588 (2009)
The common assimilation of Wittgenstein’s philosophical procedure to Freud’s psychoanalytic method is a mistake. The concurrence of Freudian analysands is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition of their unconscious thoughts having been detected. There are several sources of this error. One is the equivocal role Freud assign the patient’s recognition of the correctness of his interpretation and in particular the part played by ‘paradoxical reminiscence’: another, the surreptitious banalisation of Freud’s procedure by followers—the reinvention of psychoanalysis as a phenomenological enterprise; still another, the appeal of the activity of giving fuller expression to one’s tantalisingly vague and inexplicit thoughts and suspicions. This activity has its own intrinsic value though it ought not to be permitted to usurp the place of empirical investigation, as futile as this often is. And yet both plausible hypotheses and felicitous ‘further descriptions’ must yield in desirability to the attainment of a state of reconciliation to the person one has become however this was caused and whatever this is suspected to be.
|Keywords||The unconscious Self-knowledge Wittgenstein Freud|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
G. P. Baker (2004). Wittgenstein's Method. Wiley-Blackwell.
Hans-Johann Glock (1996). A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell.
G. E. Moore (1959). Philosophical Papers. New York, Macmillan.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Talia Welsh (2002). The Retentional and the Repressed: Does Freud's Concept of the Unconscious Threaten Husserlian Phenomenology? [REVIEW] Human Studies 25 (2):165-183.
Mick Power (2000). Freud and the Unconscious. The Psychologist. Special Issue 13 (12):612-614.
Matt Ffytche (2011). The Foundation of the Unconscious: Schelling, Freud, and the Birth of the Modern Psyche. Cambridge University Press.
David L. Smith (2002). Freud's Neural Unconscious. In Gertrudis Van de Vijver & Filip Geerardyn (eds.), The Pre-Psychoanalytic Writings of Sigmund Freud. 155-164.
Allan N. Schore (2001). The Right Brain as the Neurobiological Substratum of Freud's Dynamic Unconscious. In David E. Scharff (ed.), The Psychoanalytic Century: Freud's Legacy for the Future. Other Press. 61-88.
J. Bouveresse (1995). Wittgenstein Reads Freud: The Myth of the Unconscious. Princeton University Press.
Rudolf Bernet (2002). Unconscious Consciousness in Husserl and Freud. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (3):327-351.
Thomas Natsoulas (2000). Freud and Consciousness: X. The Place of Consciousness in Freud's Science. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought 23 (4):525-561.
Andreas Wildt (2007). Unconscious Knowledge of One's Own Mind: A Neglected Element in Freud's Theory of the Unconscious. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (s 5-6):127-151.
Constantine Sandis (2009). Hitchcock's Conscious Use of Freud's Unconscious. Europe's Journal of Psychology 3:56-81.
Added to index2009-06-22
Total downloads111 ( #8,589 of 1,096,781 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,973 of 1,096,781 )
How can I increase my downloads?