Wittgenstein on Freud's 'abominable mess'

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 28:169-192 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ‘abominable mess’ of which Wittgenstein complains is that of confounding reasons and causes. What does Wittgenstein mean to call attention to by this contrast and why does he think himself entitled to hold that Freud confounded them? Sometimes by reasons he means just what someone says on being asked why he did what he did or reacted as he reacted, and sometimes what an experience meant to a subject on further reflection upon it—its ‘further description’

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hitchcock's Conscious Use of Freud's Unconscious.Constantine Sandis - 2009 - Europe's Journal of Psychology 3:56-81.
The Freud Controversy: What is at Issue?Frank Cioffi - 1998 - In M. Roth (ed.), Freud: Conflict and Culture. Alfred A. Knopf. pp. 171-182.
Wittgenstein Reads Freud: The Myth of the Unconscious.Jacques Bouveresse - 1995 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Wittgenstein, freud, and the nature of psychoanalytic explanation.L. Sass - 2001 - In Richard Allen & Malcolm Turvey (eds.), Wittgenstein, theory, and the arts. New York: Routledge. pp. 253--295.
Freud and Wittgenstein.Brian McGuinness - 1982 - In Anthony Kenny & Brian McGuinness (eds.), Wittgenstein and His Times. University of Chicago Press.
Wittgenstein: a way of seeing.Judith Genova - 1995 - New York: Routledge.
No laughing matter.Giles Fraser - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 42 (42):90-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-23

Downloads
13 (#973,701)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references