Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):36-38 (2001)
|Abstract||I suggest that neurophysiological data, usually interpreted in cognitivist terms, is actually more supportive of dynamic frameworks such as that of Thelen et al. I outline a model of embodied action used to interpret neural data from frontal and parietal cortex, and suggest that it bears strong similarity to the framework described in the target article.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Naoyasu Motomura (1998). The Neural Basis of Imitative Behavior: Parietal Actions and Frontal Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):700-701.
Manuel de Vega (1997). Embodiment in Language-Based Memory: Some Qualifications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):22-23.
Giorgio Metta & Giulio Sandini (2001). Embodiment and Complex Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1068-1069.
Kevin A. Pelphrey & J. Steven Reznick (2001). Clothing a Model of Embodiment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):59-59.
Jerome A. Feldman (1997). Embodiment is the Foundation, Not a Level. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):746-747.
Glenn Carruthers (2009). Is the Body Schema Sufficient for the Sense of Embodiment? An Alternative to de Vignmont's Model. Philosophical Psychology 22 (2):123-142.
Raymond Tallis (2008). The Kingdom of Infinite Space: A Portrait of Your Head. Yale University Press.
David Spurrett (2003). What About Embodiment? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):620-620.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,326 of 722,861 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?