Are breast implants better than female genital mutilation? autonomy, gender equality and nussbaum's political liberalism
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (3):1-33 (2004)
This essay considers the tension between political liberalism and gender equality in the light of social construction and multiculturalism. The tension is exemplified by the work of Martha Nussbaum, who tries to reconcile a belief in the universality of certain liberal values such as gender equality with a political liberal tolerance for cultural practices that violate gender equality. The essay distinguishes between first? and second?order conceptions of autonomy, and shows that political liberals mistakenly prioritise second?order autonomy. This prioritisation leads political liberals to seek to limit state interference in individuals' choices. However, the essay argues that if options, choices and the preferences which lead to them are socially influenced or constructed, it is no longer clear that state non?interference secures autonomy. Instead, it becomes a matter of justice what the content of the social or state influence is, which options are open to people, and political liberalism cannot deal with many forms of injustice. Rather than emphasising state neutrality, liberals should endorse state prohibition of practices which cause significant harm to those who choose them, if they are chosen only in response to unjust norms
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David McCabe (2000). Knowing About the Good: A Problem with Antiperfectionism. Ethics 110 (2):311-338.
Sarah E. Waldeck (2003). Social Norm Theory and Male Circumcision: Why Parents Circumcise. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):56-57.
Nicholas C. Lund-Molfese (2003). What Is Mutilation? American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):64-65.
Citations of this work BETA
Cécile Laborde (2006). Female Autonomy, Education and the Hijab. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (3):351-377.
Mervi Patosalmi (2009). Bodily Integrity and Conceptions of Subjectivity. Hypatia 24 (2):125 - 141.
Similar books and articles
Andrea Baumeister (2006). Gender Equality and Cultural Justice : How Thin is Nussbaum's Universalism? In B. A. Haddock, Peri Roberts & Peter Sutch (eds.), Principles and Political Order: The Challenge of Diversity. Routledge
Andrew F. March, Marriage, Equality and Subsidizing Families in Liberal Public Justification: Is There a Right to Polygamy?
Andrew F. March (2011). Is There a Right to Polygamy? Marriage, Equality and Subsidizing Families in Liberal Public Justification. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2):246-272.
Elizabeth Brake (2004). Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality? Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):293-309.
Rebecca Reilly-Cooper (2009). Are Breast Implants Better Than Female Genital Mutilation? Res Publica 15 (4):415-420.
John Philip Christman & Joel Anderson (eds.) (2005). Autonomy and the Challenges of Liberalism: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Lori Watson (2007). Constituting Politics: Power, Reciprocity, and Identity. Hypatia 22 (4):96-112.
Todd May (2009). Democracy is Where We Make It. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 13 (1):3-21.
Matthias Katzer (2010). The Basis of Universal Liberal Principles in Nussbaum’s Political Philosophy. Public Reason 2 (2):61-76.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads110 ( #34,705 of 1,796,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #137,388 of 1,796,251 )
How can I increase my downloads?