Against the unification of the behavioral sciences

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):21-22 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The contemporary behavioral sciences are disunified and could not easily become unified, as they operate with incompatible explanatory models. According to Gintis, tolerance of this situation is “scandalous” (sect. 12). I defend the ordinary behavioral scientist's lack of commitment to a unifying explanatory model and identify several reasons why the behavioral sciences should remain disunified for the foreseeable future. (Published Online April 27 2007).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Information processing as one key for a unification?Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):40-40.
Do the cognitive and behavioral sciences need each other?David W. Gow Jr - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):27-28.
Unifying the behavioral sciences II.Herbert Gintis - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):45-53.
More obstacles on the road to unification.Eric Alden Smith - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):41-41.
The limitations of unification.Arthur B. Markman - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):33-34.
Implications for law of a unified behavioral science.Owen D. Jones - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):30-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#504,503)

6 months
1 (#1,459,555)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steve Clarke
Charles Sturt University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references