Clinical Governance, Performance Appraisal and Interactional and Procedural Fairness at a New Zealand Public Hospital
Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):667-678 (2013)
|Abstract||This paper explores the conduct of performance appraisals of nurses in a New Zealand hospital, and how fairness is perceived in such appraisals. In the health sector, performance appraisals of medical staff play a key role in implementing clinical governance, which, in turn, is critical to containing health care costs and ensuring quality patient care. Effective appraisals depend on employees perceiving their own appraisals to be fair both in terms of procedure and interaction with their respective appraiser. We examine qualitative data from interviews and focus groups, involving 22 nurses in a single department, to determine whether perceived injustices impact on the effective implementation of the appraisal system. Our results suggest that particular issues had been causing some sense of injustice, and most of these were procedural. Potential solutions focus on greater formalisation of the performance appraisal process, and more training for appraisers and appraisees|
|Keywords||Clinical governance Performance appraisal Interactional justice Procedural justice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Tina L. Robbins & Ben C. Jeffords (2010). Practising What We Preach: Justice and Ethical Instruction in Management Education. Ethics and Education 4 (1):93-102.
Krishna Reddy, Stuart Locke, Frank Scrimgeour & Abeyratna Gunasekarage (2008). Corporate Governance Practices of Small Cap Companies and Their Financial Performance: An Empirical Study in New Zealand. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (1):51-78.
Dan S. Chiaburu & Audrey S. Lim (2008). Manager Trustworthiness or Interactional Justice? Predicting Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3):453 - 467.
Jill Kickul, Lisa K. Gundry & Margaret Posig (2005). Does Trust Matter? The Relationship Between Equity Sensitivity and Perceived Organizational Justice. Journal of Business Ethics 56 (3):205 - 218.
Marguerite Schneider & Alix Valenti (2008). The Effects of “Going Private” on Corporate Financial and Corporate Social Performance. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:236-245.
Cristina Brandão, Guilhermina Rego, Ivone Duarte & Rui Nunes (2013). Social Responsibility: A New Paradigm of Hospital Governance? [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 21 (4):390-402.
P. J., W. S. & F. F. (2003). The Role of Working Memory in Motor Learning and Performance. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):376-402.
J. P. Maxwell, R. S. W. Masters & F. F. Eves (2003). The Role of Working Memory in Motor Learning and Performance. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (3):376-402.
Clinton Longenecker & Dean Ludwig (1990). Ethical Dilemmas in Performance Appraisal Revisited. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (12):961 - 969.
Stephen Buetow (2003). The Ethics of Public Consultation in Health Care: An Orthodox Jewish Perspective. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 11 (2):151-160.
Chalmer E. Labig (2009). Bad Measures Don't Make Good Medicine: The Ethical Implications of Unreliable and Invalid Physician Performance Measures. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (2):287 - 295.
Jill Kickul (2001). When Organizations Break Their Promises: Employee Reactions to Unfair Processes and Treatment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 29 (4):289 - 307.
Kevin W. Mossholder, William F. Giles & Mark A. Wesolowski (1991). Information Privacy and Performance Appraisal: An Examination of Employee Perceptions and Reactions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (2):151 - 156.
L. B. McCullough (2013). Critical Appraisal of Clinical Judgment: An Essential Dimension of Clinical Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (1):1-5.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-11-17
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?