Conflicts of interest arising from the prudent investor rule: Ethical implications for over-the-counter derivative securities [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 47 (2):165 - 173 (2003)
The Prudent Investor Rule creates a potential ethical dilemma for investment advisors selling over-the-counter financial products issued by their firms. The "opportunity" to defraud investors using complex, over-the-counter derivative securities designed for client-specific risk management is much higher than for exchange traded securities. This paper emphasizes the ethical responsibility held by trustees and their organizations to eliminate potential conflict of interests through internal control and monitoring. Independent evaluations of the performance of investment advisors and independent appraisals of complex over-the-counter securities are important in reducing the risks of conflicts of interest. Recent lessons learned from the corporate ethics crisis and requirements of the 2002 Sarbanes Oxley Act would suggest that conflict of interest must be eliminated with third party validation of derivative pricing. By performing due diligence and validation, the trustee is able to satisfy the requirements under the Prudent Investor Rule.
|Keywords||Philosophy Ethics Business Education Economic Growth Management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David B. Resnik (1998). Conflicts of Interest in Science. Perspectives on Science 6 (4):381-408.
Richard Lee Miller (1988). Ethical Challenges in Corporate-Shareholder and Investor Relations: Using the Value Exchange Model to Analyze and Respond. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):117 - 132.
Alan Lewis (1999). Morals and Markets. Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (3):439-452.
F. P. Schadler & J. E. Karns (1990). The Unethical Exploitation of Shareholders in Management Buyout Transactions. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (7):595 - 602.
Adam Nguyen & Wesley Cragg (2012). Interorganizational Favour Exchange and the Relationship Between Doing Well and Doing Good. Journal of Business Ethics 105 (1):53-68.
Steven R. Salbu (1992). A Critical Analysis of Misappropriation Theory in Insider Trading Cases. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (4):465-477.
Jeffrey S. Miller (2009). Opportunistic Disclosures of Earnings Forecasts and Non-GAAP Earnings Measures. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):3 - 10.
Paul J. Friedman (1992). The Troublesome Semantics of Conflict of Interest. Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):245 – 251.
Jan H. W. Goslings (1997). Ethical Behaviour and Securities Trading. Business Ethics 6 (3):147–152.
Robert E. Frederick & W. Michael Hoffman (1990). The Individual Investor in Securities Markets: An Ethical Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 9 (7):579 - 589.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #281,563 of 1,410,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #155,456 of 1,410,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?