Coercive redistribution and public agreement: re-evaluating the libertarian challenge of charity
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1):93-114 (2010)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesYe Chuang (2008). The Limit of Charity and Agreement. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):99 - 122.
Gerald K. Harrison (2010). A Challenge for Soft Line Replies to Manipulation Cases. Philosophia 38 (3):555-568.
J. -F. Menard (2010). A 'Nudge' for Public Health Ethics: Libertarian Paternalism as a Framework for Ethical Analysis of Public Health Interventions? Public Health Ethics 3 (3):229-238.
Liam B. Murphy & Thomas Nagel (2001). Taxes, Redistribution, and Public Provision. Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (1):53–71.
Chuang Ye (2008). The Limit of Charity and Agreement. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):99-122.
Roy Sorensen (2004). Charity Implies Meta-Charity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):290 - 315.
Peter Pagin (2006). The Status of Charity II: Charity, Probability, and Simplicity. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):361 – 383.
Andrew Lister (2010). Public Justification and the Limits of State Action. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (2):151-175.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads9 ( #114,124 of 549,118 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,118 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
