David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29 (2):89–108 (1999)
Human action has generally appeared to the sociologist as instrumental action, movement conceptualized and valued in terms of its utility, with the actor defined in terms of agency within rationalized social systems . Dance provides a way of seeing that conditions for human existence cannot be reduced to socio-economic relations and forms. Drawing on my ethnographic study of a dance improvisation group, I explore some of the ways in which innovative action resists the productive and textual relations that turn bodies into objects of social control in the capitalist world-order, and creates relations that enable ‘free’ action and liberated subjectivities. Innovations disrupt the pre-existing frames of reference, physical and linguistic, that position the subject in the world of work, and establish an unlimited and undetermined time-space for experiencing ‘something new’. In this case the something new is an opportunity to create oneself anew through choices that are made moving ‘free’ from the constraints of practical activity. Within the intersubjective life-world established through innovative action a space is created for individuation and empowerment. Although these conditions for existence are episodically produced and contingent, they begin and end with the dancing, the relations are self-affirming rather than self-alienating. Dance improvisation experience provides a sociological context for presenting human activity as a contested category in sociological theory, and it raises some important questions about what it means to be human in the world
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Max Velmans (1996). Consciousness and the "Causal Paradox". Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):538-542.
Helen A. Fielding (2011). Multiple Moving Perceptions of the Real: Arendt, Merleau-Ponty, and Truitt. Hypatia 26 (3):518-534.
Randolph Clarke (2010). Skilled Activity and the Causal Theory of Action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (3):523-550.
Caroline Joan Picart (2008). Transnationalities, Bodies, and Power: Dancing Across Different Worlds. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 22 (3):pp. 191-204.
John F. Crosby (1993). The Personhood of the Human Embryo. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (4):399-417.
Romand Coles (2004). Moving Democracy: Industrial Areas Foundation Social Movements and the Political Arts of Listening, Traveling, and Tabling. Political Theory 32 (5):678-705.
Caroline Joan (2008). Transnationalities, Bodies, and Power: Dancing Across Different Worlds. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 22 (3):191-204.
Jesús Mosterín (2001). Self-Conciousness and Cosmic Consciousness. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:213-222.
M. Walker & Elaine Perry (2002). Dementia with Lewy Bodies: A Disorder of Consciousness? In Elaine Perry, Heather Ashton & Andrew W. Young (eds.), Neurochemistry of Consciousness. John Benjamins 36--263.
B. van Heuveln, Eric Dietrich & M. Oshima (1998). Let's Dance! The Equivocation in Chalmers' Dancing Qualia Argument. Minds and Machines 8 (2):237-249.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #479,498 of 1,911,478 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #457,145 of 1,911,478 )
How can I increase my downloads?