Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy 83 (1):25-53 (2008)
|Abstract||I consider reasons for questioning 'the laws of logic' (identity, non-contradiction, excluded middle, and negation), and suggest that these laws do not accord with everyday reality. Either they are rhetorical tools rather than absolute truths, or else Plato and his successors were right to think that they identify a reality distinct from the ordinary world of experience, and also from the ultimate source of reality|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
George Boole (1859/1991). Derivation of the Laws of the Symbols of Logic From the Laws of the Operations of the Human Mind: An Excerpt From the Writings of George Boole. St. Sebastian Press.
Gerhard Schurz (2004). Normic Laws, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, and the Unity of Science. In S. Rahman (ed.), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht, Kluwer.
Ralf-Dieter Schindler, John Steel & Martin Zeman (2002). Deconstructing Inner Model Theory. Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):721-736.
Carlo Cellucci (1998). The Scope of Logic: Deduction, Abduction, Analogy. Theoria 64 (2-3):217-242.
Laurence Goldstein (2009). Stephen Clark, the Laws of Logic and the Sorites. Philosophy 84 (1):135-143.
Dallas Willard (2003). A Realist Analysis of the Relationship Between Logic and Experience. Topoi 22 (1):69-78.
E. D. Klemke (1966). The Laws of Logic. Philosophy of Science 33 (3):271-277.
Stephen R. L. Clark (2008). Deconstructing the Laws of Logic. Philosophy 83 (01).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #55,763 of 739,140 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,140 )
How can I increase my downloads?