David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):8-19 (2002)
Michael Polanyi was perhaps the most important emergence theorist of the middle of the 20th century. As the key link between the British Emergentists of the 1920s and the explosion of emergence theory in the 1990s, he played a crucial role in resisting reductionist interpretations of science and keeping the concept of emergence alive. Polanyi’s position on emergence is described and its major strengths and weaknesses are analyzed. Using Polanyi as the foundation, the article surveys the major contemporary options in thephilosophy of mind and defends a particular understanding of the relationship of mental properties to brain states
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Paul Richard Blum (2010). Michael Polanyi: The Anthropology of Intellectual History. Studies in East European Thought 62 (2):197 - 216.
Paul Richard Blum (2010). Michael Polanyi: The Anthropology of Intellectual History. Studies in East European Thought 62 (2):197-216.
Similar books and articles
Gregory R. Peterson (2002). Emergence and Supervenience. Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):23-27.
Philip Clayton (2002). Emergence — A Response to My Critics. Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):48-51.
Philip Clayton & P. C. W. Davies (eds.) (2006). The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis From Science to Religion. Oxford University Press.
James van Cleve (1990). Mind-Dust or Magic? Panpsychism Versus Emergence. Philosophical Perspectives 4:215-226.
James van Cleve (1990). Mind -- Dust or Magic? Panpsychism Versus Emergence. Philosophical Perspectives 4:215-226.
J. Butterfield (2011). Emergence, Reduction and Supervenience: A Varied Landscape. [REVIEW] Foundations of Physics 41 (6):920-959.
Walter B. Gulick (2002). Response to Clayton. Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):32-47.
Martinez Hewlett (2002). On Polanyi, Clayton, and Biology. Tradition and Discovery 29 (3):20-22.
Alexander Rueger (2000). Robust Supervenience and Emergence. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):466-491.
Carl Gillett (2002). The Varieties of Emergence: Their Purposes, Obligations and Importance. Grazer Philosophische Studien 65 (1):95-121.
Paul Humphreys (2008). Computational and Conceptual Emergence. Philosophy of Science 75 (5):584-594.
Andreas Hüttemanna & Orestis Terzidis (2000). Emergence in Physics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):267 – 281.
Andreas Hüttemanna & Orestis Terzidis (2000). Emergence in Physics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):267-281.
Philip Clayton (2006). Conceptual Foundations of Emergence Theory. In Philip Clayton & Paul Sheldon Davies (eds.), The Re-Emergence of Emergence. Oxford University Press 1--31.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads51 ( #87,430 of 1,934,427 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #113,162 of 1,934,427 )
How can I increase my downloads?