Hypatia 12 (1):79--98 (1997)
|Abstract||Irigaray demonstrates that metaphysics depends upon the specific negation and exclusion of the female body. Readings of Irigaray's Speculum of the Other Woman tend to highlight the status of this excluded materiality: is there an essential female body which precedes negation or is the feminine only an effect of exclusion? I approach Irigaray's work by way of another question: is it possible to move beyond a feminist critique of metaphysics and towards a feminist philosophy?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alison Stone (2006). Luce Irigaray and the Philosophy of Sexual Difference. Cambridge University Press.
Christine Battersby (1998). The Phenomenal Woman: Feminist Metaphysics and the Patterns of Identity. Routledge.
Karen Green (2002). The Other as Another Other. Hypatia 17 (4):1-15.
Dorothea Olkowski (2000). The End of Phenomenology: Bergson's Interval in Irigaray. Hypatia 15 (3):73-91.
Lynda Haas (1993). Review: Of Waters and Women: The Philosophy of Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Hypatia 8 (4):150 - 159.
Evelien Geerts, Luce Irigaray: The (Un)Dutiful Daughter of Psychoanalysis. A Feminist ‘Moving Through and Beyond’ the Phallogocentric Discourse of Psychoanalysis.
Joyce Nira Davidson & Mick Smith (1999). Wittgenstein and Irigaray: Gender and Philosophy in a Language (Game) of Difference. Hypatia 14 (2):72 - 96.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads12 ( #93,438 of 549,162 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,162 )
How can I increase my downloads?