Intrinsic finks
Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):512–518 (2008)
| Abstract | Dispositions can be finkish, prone to disappear in circumstances that would commonly trigger their characteristic manifestations. Can a disposition be finkish because of something intrinsic to the object possessing that disposition? Sungho Choi has argued that this is not possible, and many agree. Here it is argued that no good case has been made for ruling out the possibility of intrinsic finks; on the contrary, there is good reason to accept it. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid Lewis (1997). Finkish Dispositions. Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):143-158.
Randolph Clarke (2010). Opposing Powers. Philosophical Studies 149 (2).
Alexander Bird (2004). Antidotes All the Way Down? Theoria 19 (3):259-269.
Alexander Bird (2004). Antidotes All the Way Down? Theoria 19 (3):259–69.
A. Bird & T. Handfield (2008). Dispositions, Rules and Finks. Philosophical Studies 140:285-98.
Sungho Choi (2011). Intrinsic Finks and Dispositional/Categorical Distinction. Noûs 46 (2):289-325.
Toby Handfield (2008). Unfinkable Dispositions. Synthese 160 (2):297 - 308.
Toby Handfield & Alexander Bird (2008). Dispositions, Rules, and Finks. Philosophical Studies 140 (2):285 - 298.
Anthony Everett (2009). Intrinsic Finks, Masks, and Mimics. Erkenntnis 71 (2):191 - 203.
Lauren Ashwell (2010). Superficial Dispositionalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):635-653.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads35 ( #34,138 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
