David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Inquiry 26 (4):425 – 445 (1983)
Maclntyre's claim that contemporary moral language is, by traditional standards, merely chaotic somewhat exaggerates our chaos, and traditional order. He accuses. Moore and his disciples in particular of using moral language merely as propaganda, failing, like other critics, to reckon with the Platonic context of Moore's argument and the reasons why Goodness is an idea that rational inquiry should not abandon. Genuine moral action is done as the right thing, that produces more that is good than any alternative. Plato's model of the threefold structure of human motivation, and his image of the cave, locates moral action at a higher level than action from desire or social prejudice. We discover our real selves, distinct from our physical and social natures, in seeing what Goodness requires. This neo?Platonism is a better bet than Maclntyre allows, and an answer to the barbarian puppeteers he rightly condemns
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
George Edward Moore (1942). A Reply to My Critics. In Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of G. E. Moore. Open Court
C. S. Lewis (1947). The Abolition of Man. New York, the Macmillan Company.
Stephen R. L. Clark (1983). Sexual Ontology and Group Marriage: Stephen R. L. Clark. Philosophy 58 (224):215-227.
Stephen R. L. Clark (1983). Sexual Ontology and Group Marriage. Philosophy 58 (224):215 - 227.
Stephen R. L. Clark (1983). Waking-Up: A Neglected Model for the Afterlife. Inquiry 26 (2):209 – 230.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ruth Anna Putnam (2008). Why Not Moral Realism? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):17 – 29.
Mark van Roojen (2006). Knowing Enough to Disagree: A New Response to the Moral Twin Earth Argument. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 1. Clarendon Press 161-94.
Jack Temkin (1984). Singer, Moore, and the Metaphysics of Morals. Philosophy Research Archives 10:567-571.
Alasdair Maclntyre (1983). Iv. Moral Rationality, Tradition, and Aristotle: A Reply to Onora O'Neill, Raimond Gaita, and Stephen R. L. Clark. Inquiry 26 (4):447 – 466.
Stephen E. Fow (1991). Could Horace Talk with the Hebrews? Translatability and Moral Disagreement in MacIntyre and Stout. Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (1):1 - 20.
Peter J. Mehl (1991). In the Twilight of Modernity: MacIntyre and Mitchell on Moral Traditions and Their Assessment. Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (1):21 - 54.
Raimond Gaita (1983). Ii. Virtues, Human Good, and the Unity of a Life. Inquiry 26 (4):407 – 424.
Onora O'Neill (1983). I. Kant After Virtue. Inquiry 26 (4):387 – 405.
Jeffrey Bloechl (1998). The Virtue of History: Alasdair Maclntyre and the Rationality of Narrative. Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (1):43-61.
Added to index2009-03-05
Total downloads9 ( #340,765 of 1,790,290 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #322,106 of 1,790,290 )
How can I increase my downloads?