David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (4):420-447 (2009)
This paper proposes a theory of institutional pluralism to deal with the question whether and to what extent limits should be placed on the market. It reconceives the pluralist position as it was presented by Michael Walzer and others in several respects. First, it argues that the options on the institutional menu should not be principles of distribution but rather economic mechanisms or ‘modes of provision’. This marks a shift from a distributive to a provisional logic. Second, it argues that we should drop the assumption that any good should only be placed in one sphere, i.e. distributed according to one distributive principle. This marks a shift to ‘complex pluralism’: for at least some goods it is appropriate that they are provided through the market and through one or more non-market alternatives simultaneously. Finally, it argues that the often used conventionalist justification should be traded for a capability approach to the moral evaluation of markets and non-market alternatives. Any institutional option on our menu has value to the extent that it enhances the morally relevant capabilities of the producers and/or consumers of the good that is to be provided. This approach will be illustrated with two examples of goods for which it yields complex pluralist conclusions: the provision of care and the provision of media content
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Schiff Berman (2012). Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Border. Cambridge University Press.
Rutger Claassen (2011). The Commodification of Care. Hypatia 26 (1):43-64.
Astrid Link, Descriptive and Normative Aspects of the Theory of Legal Pluralism : Illustrated by Problems of Media Regulation.
Joan McGregor (1988). Bargaining Advantages and Coercion in the Market. Philosophy Research Archives 14:23-50.
Virginia Held (2002). Care and the Extension of Markets. Hypatia 17 (2):19-33.
Peter Dietsch (2010). The Market, Competition, and Equality. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (2):213-244.
Matt Zwolinski (2009). Price Gouging, Non-Worseness, and Distributive Justice. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2):295-306.
James R. Wible (1995). The Economic Organization of Science, the Firm, and the Marketplace. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1):35-68.
Friedrich Heubel (2000). Patients or Customers: Ethical Limits of Market Economy in Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (2):240 – 253.
Rutger Claassen (2011). Communication as Commodity: Should the Media Be on the Market? Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):65-79.
Added to index2009-10-24
Total downloads23 ( #104,720 of 1,696,258 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #177,960 of 1,696,258 )
How can I increase my downloads?