Moral sentiments and reciprocal obligations: The case for pension fund investment in community development
Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (1):7 – 24 (2000)
| Abstract | Squeezed between increasing entitlement expenditures and static or declining real revenues, state-funded urban development is increasingly perceived as an unaffordable luxury. At the same time, the power and significance of the banking sector is giving way to new kinds of financial institutions that have little or no interest in community development. Not surprisingly, it is often argued that pension funds ought to be more sensitive to community needs. However, some analysts argue that pension funds are properly only the agents of plan beneficiaries; any investment that took into account community needs would be, in effect, an unjustified tax on individuals' future welfare. Furthermore, analysts are very doubtful about the integrity of public pension plan investment decision-making. In this paper, I set out a morally informed justification of public pension plan investment in community development. In doing so, I develop a model of community development that stresses the reciprocal nature of the obligations embedded in the relationship between the community and pension plan beneficiaries. This approach also has significant implications for a wide variety of private sponsored plans. The paper begins with an assessment of pension fund decision-making and the practices of the investment management industry, drawing upon related research on pension fund capitalism. It goes on to issues of social obligation, referencing recent research on the nature of social contracts. To give the analysis empirical relevance I refer to the much disputed decision of the West Virginia legislature to require their public pension funds' Investment Management Board to invest in the state government's corrections authority. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTessa Hebb (2006). The Economic Inefficiency of Secrecy: Pension Fund Investors' Corporate Transparency Concerns. Journal of Business Ethics 63 (4):385 - 405.
Josep M. Lozano, Laura Albareda & M. Rosario Balaguer (2006). Socially Responsible Investment in the Spanish Financial Market. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (3):305 - 316.
Jeffrey S. Harrison & James O. Fiet (1999). New CEOs Pursue Their Own Self-Interests by Sacrificing Stakeholder Value. Journal of Business Ethics 19 (3):301 - 308.
Bryan Dennis (2003). The Ethical Undercurrents of Pension Fund Management. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (3):315-335.
S. Prakash Sethi (2005). Investing in Socially Responsible Companies is a Must for Public Pension Funds – Because There is No Better Alternative. Journal of Business Ethics 56 (2):99 - 129.
Luis Ferruz, Fernando Muñoz & Maria Vargas (2010). Stock Picking, Market Timing and Style Differences Between Socially Responsible and Conventional Pension Funds: Evidence From the United Kingdom. Business Ethics 19 (4):408-422.
Douglas Cumming & Sofia Johan (2007). Socially Responsible Institutional Investment in Private Equity. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (4):395 - 416.
Nada Kakabadse & Andrew Kakabadse (2004). Pension Funds Governance: An Overview of the Role of Trustees. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (1):3-26.
Paul Cox (2005). Tournament Incentives and Pension Fund Manager Holdings of Socially Performing Stocks. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:93-98.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads4 ( #178,585 of 549,067 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,067 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
