Narratology and the history of science

The difference between an historian and a poet is not that one writes in prose and the other in verse--indeed the writings of Herodotus could be put into verse and yet would still be a kind of history ... The real difference is this, that one tells what happened and the other what might happen. For this reason poetry is something more philosophical and serious than history, because poetry tends to give general truths while history gives particular facts.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 14,275
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
William Clark (1992). Poetics for Scientists. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (1):181-192.
William Clark (1993). The Misogyny of Scholars. Perspectives on Science 2:342-57.
Ian Hacking (1991). Artificial Phenomena. British Journal for the History of Science 24 (2):235-241.

View all 10 references

Citations of this work BETA
Natalie Lawrence (2014). Plumed Wonders and Ornithological Passions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 47:206-209.
Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

14 ( #170,159 of 1,700,365 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,365 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.