Narrative and Theories of Desire

Critical Inquiry 16 (1):33-53 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The hope of moving beyond formalism is one of two things that unites an otherwise diverse group of literary theorists who have begun to explore the role of desire in narrative. Peter Brooks, for example, in Reading for the Plot, says in more than one place that his interest in desire “derives from my dissatisfaction with the various formalisms that have dominated critical thinking about narrative.”3 Leo Bersani sees desire as establishing a crucial link between social and literary structures. Teresa de Lauretis faults structuralist models for their inability to disclose the ways in which narrative operates, through the desire it excites and fulfills, to construct the social world as a system of sexual differences. Other names could be added, both within and outside the field of narrative theory—Nancy Armstrong, Roland Barthes, Georges Bataille, Jessica Benjamin, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, René Girard, Luce Irigaray, Fredric Jameson, Peggy Kamuf, Linda Kauffman, Julia Kristeva, Jacques Lacan, Jean Laplance, Catharine A. McKinnon, and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick—for desire has become one of the master tropes of contemporary criticism. 3. Peter Brooks, Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative , p. 47; hereafter abbreviated RP.4. Leo, Bersani, A Future for Astyanax: Character and Desire in Literature , p. 13; hereafter abbreviated FA.5. Bersani and Ulysse Dutoit, The Forms of Violence: Narrative in Assyrian Art and Modern Culture , p. v; hereafter abbreviated FV. Although Bersani coauthored this book with Dutoit, for convenience I refer to it by Bersani’s name alone. This practice is justified by two considerations: first, most of the arguments about narrative, violence, and desire are elaborations of positions that Bersani has taken in earlier works; second, passages and examples in the sections with which I shall be dealing are reprinted with only minor changes from an article that Bersani published under his own name. Jay Clayton, associate professor of English at Vanderbilt University, is the author of Romantic Vision and the Novel and coeditor of Contemporary Literature and Contemporary Theory . He is currently completing a study of contemporary American literature and theory, Narrative Power.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Preferentism and the paradox of desire.Bradford Skow - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2009 (3):1-17.
Philosophy and Desire.Hugh J. Silverman (ed.) - 2000 - New York: Routledge.
Narrative, Morality and Religion.J. Wesley Robbins - 1980 - Journal of Religious Ethics 8 (1):161 - 176.
The Desire-Frustration Theory of Suspense.Aaron Smuts - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (3):281-291.
Theories of Desire.Patrick Fuery - 1995 - Carlton, Vic.: Melbourne University Press.
Three compatible theories of desire.Noa Latham - 2006 - Dialogue 45 (1):131-138.
Desire-Based Theories of Reasons, Pleasure and Welfare.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 6:79-106.
Absent Desires.Toby Handfield - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (4):402-427.
A paradox for some theories of welfare.Ben Bradley - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (1):45 - 53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
29 (#538,668)

6 months
7 (#418,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Textual Jealousies in Chariton’s Callirhoe.David F. Elmer - 2022 - Classical Antiquity 41 (1):180-220.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references